docs: remove misleading “highlighted” wording in subschema examples

[pranjalisr]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Docs change

Issue Number:

• Closes Feedback on Documentation - Modular schema highlighted subschema #1563

Screenshots/videos:
N/A

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Yes

Summary

The examples don’t visually highlight any portion of the schema, so references to “highlighted” subschemas can be confusing. This updates the wording to describe the referenced subschema without implying visual highlighting.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• [✅ ] Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

[github-actions]

Hi @pranjalisr! Thanks a lot for your contribution!

I noticed that the following required information is missing or incomplete: completed checklist items

Please update the PR description to include this information. You can find placeholders in the PR template for these items.

Thanks a lot!

[github-actions]

built with Refined Cloudflare Pages Action

⚡ Cloudflare Pages Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Last Commit
website	✅ Ready (View Log)	Visit Preview	4dedc75

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 79.16667% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 99.28%. Comparing base (2ee67ff) to head (7715ad7).
⚠️ Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
components/JsonEditor.tsx	79.16%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main    #2271      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   99.28%   -0.72%     
===========================================
  Files           30       30              
  Lines          663      698      +35     
  Branches       205      219      +14     
===========================================
+ Hits           663      693      +30     
- Misses           0        5       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Utkarsh-123github]

Hi @pranjalisr
For this issue, the expected fix is to write a highlight function (or use it if it is already present in the codebase) and not to change the doc,

[pranjalisr]

Hi @pranjalisr For this issue, the expected fix is to write a highlight function (or use it if it is already present in the codebase) and not to change the doc,

I got confused as in issue label it was mentioned documentation so I thought it's docs change but now I've added highlights. Checked locally, working fine.

[Utkarsh-123github]

Hi @pranjalisr
Your PR is currently failing the required checks.
Whenever you get a chance, could you please take a look and address them?
Thanks

[pranjalisr]

Hi @pranjalisr Your PR is currently failing the required checks. Whenever you get a chance, could you please take a look and address them? Thanks

I've added all required tests for my code changes, verified locally on cypress, running fine. Please review

[pranjalisr]

@Utkarsh-123github if this works fine then can you please assign me #1988 or #1832
Anyone of them will work