Skip to content

Reframe README positioning around the official Claude Code loop taxonomy#17

Merged
ksimback merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
positioning-loops-taxonomy
Jul 7, 2026
Merged

Reframe README positioning around the official Claude Code loop taxonomy#17
ksimback merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
positioning-loops-taxonomy

Conversation

@ksimback

@ksimback ksimback commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What

Tier 1 docs/positioning pass prompted by the Claude Code team's "Getting started with loops" guide.

  • The /goal-vs-/loop section now leads with the official taxonomy — turn-based / goal-based / time-based / proactive — organized by what each loop type hands off (the check, the stop condition, the trigger, the whole prompt), and shows which Looper artifact supplies each hand-off.
  • /schedule and routines join the scheduling discussion and the comparison table (they were absent).
  • New looper lint row in the table (static design checks are now a real differentiator).
  • Accuracy fix: /goal's stop condition is checked by an evaluator model per the official docs, so the "same model grading its own homework" claim is softened to what is actually true — single-vendor evaluation with no typed rubric and no model-family choice.

Docs only; no code paths touched. 41/41 tests green locally.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The comparison section now leads with the official four-type taxonomy
(turn-based / goal-based / time-based / proactive) and maps what each
type hands off (check, stop condition, trigger, whole prompt) onto the
Looper artifact that supplies it. Adds /schedule and routines to the
scheduling discussion and table, adds a looper lint row, and corrects
the /goal critique to match the documented evaluator-model behavior
(single-vendor evaluation rather than literal self-grading).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ksimback
ksimback merged commit a38d4eb into main Jul 7, 2026
9 checks passed
@ksimback
ksimback deleted the positioning-loops-taxonomy branch July 7, 2026 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant