chore: normalize indentation in GetOptions struct#117
Open
rishi-jat wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Rishi Jat <rishijat098@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
/cc @Rupam-It |
clubanderson
added
the
kind/cleanup
Contributor
❌ PR Title Verification FailedYour PR title does not follow the required format. Current title: Required FormatPR titles must start with one of these emoji prefixes:
How to FixEdit your PR title to start with the appropriate emoji. For example:
You can edit the title by clicking the Edit button next to your PR title. This comment was posted to help you fix the PR title format. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adjusts the alignment of fields in the GetOptions struct for consistent formatting.
No functional changes; this is a formatting-only cleanup to prepare for the upcoming refactor.
Related issue #115