Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions readme.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ The firmware is compatible with both the Pico 2 board (based on the RP2350 chip)
The [original Pico](https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-pico/) (RP2040 chip) supports half the number of instructions and has a slower maximum clock speed.

> [!CAUTION]
> The RP2350 currently has a hardware design bug that impacts the operation of the internal pull-down resistor on GPIO pins configured as inputs.
> The RP2350 A2 stepping currently has a hardware design bug that impacts the operation of the internal pull-down resistor on GPIO pins configured as inputs.
> This may impact the operation of the PrawnBlaster trigger inputs when using the RP2350, depending on the specs of your trigger. For full details, see errata E9 in the [RP2350 datasheet](https://datasheets.raspberrypi.com/rp2350/rp2350-datasheet.pdf).
> The issue can usually be fixed by providing a suitably sized external pull-down resistor on the relevant input pins.
> The issue can usually be fixed by providing a suitably sized external pull-down resistor on the relevant input pins or avoiding boards with A2 steppings in favor of boards with A3 and A4 steppings which do not have this problem.
> RP2040 based boards do not suffer from this issue (but have reduced timing and storage compared to the RP2350).

## What is a pseudoclock device?
Expand Down