fix: kernel type mismatch in cutsat eq_def proofs#13587
Open
leodemoura wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Open
fix: kernel type mismatch in cutsat eq_def proofs#13587leodemoura wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
eq_def proofs#13587leodemoura wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
|
Mathlib CI status (docs):
|
Collaborator
|
Reference manual CI status:
|
8b2bd5a to
4033d00
Compare
4033d00 to
afbfa6c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a kernel type mismatch raised by
lia/grindwhen internalizing an integer expression whose syntactic structure differs from the structure of its polynomial representation. The mismatch occurred because theeq_defproof term bridgedx.denote ctx = e.denote ctxtoPoly.denote' ctx p = 0via a plainEq.refl e, butPoly.denote'collapses sub-structure such as a trailing+ 0(the(.num 0)monomial is dropped) whileekeeps it. The kernel then rejected the application because the equality betweenx.denoteandPoly.denote' pdid not hold definitionally.Closes #13572.