Skip to content

Add RFP-010 for Private Launchpad & Token Issuance#14

Open
hackyguru wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
rfp010
Open

Add RFP-010 for Private Launchpad & Token Issuance#14
hackyguru wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
rfp010

Conversation

@hackyguru
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This document outlines the requirements for a private launchpad and token issuance platform, detailing the necessary functionality, security measures, usability features, and team profile needed for development.

This document outlines the requirements for a private launchpad and token issuance platform, detailing the necessary functionality, security measures, usability features, and team profile needed for development.
fryorcraken added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
Three RFPs removed; two lambda prizes added; remaining RFPs reframed
around existing-project prior art.

Removed RFPs:
- RFP-022 (Bonded Atomic Swaps)
- RFP-023 (Reputation-Based Atomic Swaps)
- RFP-026 (Fee-Burn Atomic Swaps)

These RFPs specified solutions to two open problems where the Logos team
would rather not pre-judge the design. They were prescriptive about the
mechanism (bonds, reputation primitives, fee-burns) when the more honest
posture is to frame the problem and let solvers compete.

New lambda prizes (staged in lambda-prizes/; to move to logos-co/lambda-prize
when accepted):
- LP-0018 (Anti-Spam Mechanism for Atomic Swaps): frames the taker-spam
  / free-option problem. References eigenwallet PR #675 as one example
  of reference prior art but does not prescribe the approach. Solvers
  may design bonds, fee-burns, reputation, deposits, slashing schemes,
  or any combination. Success criteria require non-custody preservation,
  incentive-compatibility argument, direction-coverage statement, and
  honest-refund handling.
- LP-0019 (Off-Chain Verifiable Reputation for Atomic-Swap Makers):
  frames the off-chain attribution / verifiable-complaint problem.
  Lists naive view-key disclosure, FCMP++-grade zk proofs, multi-party
  attestation, and watchtower designs as candidates without prescribing
  the answer. Success criteria require sybil resistance, spam
  resistance, third-party verifiability without trusting the
  complainant, and complainant-side privacy.

Reframed remaining RFPs around existing-project inspiration:
- RFP-021: already cited Thorchain/Serai/Maya/Chainflip. Relationship
  section updated to point at LP-0018 and LP-0019 instead of the
  deleted RFP-022/023.
- RFP-024: added "Inspired by existing prior art" paragraph naming
  Synthetix (CDP minting mechanic, SIP-302 Pools V3) and eigenwallet/
  COMIT (peer-to-peer atomic-swap redemption). The novelty is the
  combination, not either half. Updated all cross-references to the
  deleted RFPs.
- RFP-025: Option 2a now explicitly framed as inspired by Thorchain's
  bonded-validator model (operators post slashable stake against a
  defined performance contract); Option 2b explicitly framed as
  adopting sBTC's threshold-signer custody model with an oracle-priced
  peg layer. Both link to appendix-documented existing projects.
- All references to RFP-022/023/026 replaced with pointers to LP-0018
  or LP-0019 as appropriate.

Appendix coverage check: every project named in the remaining RFPs
(Thorchain, Serai, Maya, Chainflip, Wormhole, sBTC, Stacks, Synthetix,
eigenwallet, COMIT, Farcaster, Haven, Liquality, AtomicDEX, Komodo,
Secret Monero Bridge, Secret Network) is documented in at least one
appendix (atomic-swaps-primer.md, cross-chain-trust-model-contrast.md,
or synthetics-design-space.md).

Decisions log (proposals-review/pr-57-decisions.md) appended with a
"Bundle restructure 2026-05-22 (afternoon)" section summarising the
shift. Deferred bond-system review findings (#3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8,
#12, #14) are no longer relevant since the bonded-atomic-swap design
they applied to has been removed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant