Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
You've done a great job with the test suite for the splitInteger function, covering most of the required scenarios well. I am requesting one small change before approving your work, as the test suite is missing a required test case from the task description.
Please add a test in src/splitInteger.test.js to cover the splitInteger(32, 6) scenario, which should return [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6]. Once that's added, your solution will be complete. Keep up the great work!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { | ||
|
|
||
| expect(splitInteger(2, 5)).toEqual([0, 0, 0, 1, 1]); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You've done a good job covering most of the examples from the description. However, one required test case is missing: splitInteger(32, 6). Please add a test to cover this scenario as well.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job addressing the feedback and adding the missing test case! All the requirements have been met, so I am approving your submission.
As a minor suggestion for improvement, consider updating the test description in src/splitInteger.test.js. The current description, 'should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', is a bit misleading for the test case splitInteger(32, 6). A more accurate description might be something like 'should correctly split a number with a remainder'.
This is just a suggestion for clarity and doesn't require any changes. Excellent work!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| expect(splitInteger(17, 4)).toEqual([4, 4, 4, 5]); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test description is a bit misleading. For the test case splitInteger(32, 6), the value (32) is not less than numberOfParts (6). A more accurate description might be something like 'should correctly split a number with a remainder'.
3 participants
No description provided.