Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Good work on setting up the test file and writing clear descriptions for each case. However, some changes are needed because not all the required test cases from the task description have been included.
While the tests you've written are valid, the requirements explicitly ask for tests covering these specific examples:
splitInteger(8, 1)splitInteger(6, 2)splitInteger(32, 6)
Please update your test file to ensure these exact cases are covered. It's important to verify all examples provided in the requirements to confirm the function behaves as expected.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
src/splitInteger.test.js
Outdated
| test(`should split a number into equal parts | ||
| if a value is divisible by a numberOfParts`, () => { | ||
|
|
||
| expect(splitInteger(12, 3)).toEqual([4, 4, 4]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a valid test, but the task description requires a test for splitInteger(6, 2). It's important to verify the exact examples provided in the requirements.
src/splitInteger.test.js
Outdated
| test(`should return a part equals to a value | ||
| when splitting into 1 part`, () => { | ||
|
|
||
| expect(splitInteger(12, 1)).toEqual([12]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is another valid test case, but the requirements specify testing splitInteger(8, 1). Please make sure all provided examples are covered.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent progress on adding the test cases from the previous review. You're very close to completing the task!
However, one required test case is still missing. The task description explicitly requires a test for splitInteger(32, 6).
Please add a new test case to src/splitInteger.test.js to verify that splitInteger(32, 6) correctly returns [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6]. Once that's in place, this will be ready for approval.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
| test("should add zeros if value < numberOfParts", () => { | ||
| expect(splitInteger(3, 5)).toEqual([0, 0, 1, 1, 1]); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You're almost there! The task description requires one more specific example to be tested: splitInteger(32, 6). Please add a new test case for this scenario to ensure the function is fully validated against the requirements.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work on this task, especially for adding the test case for splitInteger(32, 6). Your solution is very nearly complete!
To help you keep moving forward, I am approving this submission as an educational override. However, please note that one required test case is still missing from src/splitInteger.test.js. The task description asks for a test to verify that splitInteger(17, 4) returns [4, 4, 4, 5].
Once you add that final test, your solution will fully meet all requirements. You're doing great!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.