Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job on writing a comprehensive set of tests that cover all the examples from the task description! Your submission is very close to being approved.
However, one change is needed in src/splitInteger.test.js. One of your test cases uses splitInteger(0, 1). According to the task requirements, the value argument will always be a positive integer, and 0 is not positive.
Please update this test case to use a valid positive integer to ensure all tests align with the function's specified contract. Once that's fixed, your solution should be good to go!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
src/splitInteger.test.js
Outdated
| when splitting into 1 part`, () => {}); | ||
| when splitting into 1 part`, () => { | ||
| expect(splitInteger(8, 1)).toEqual([8]); | ||
| expect(splitInteger(0, 1)).toEqual([0]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The task description specifies that the value argument will always be a positive integer. Since 0 is not a positive integer, this test case doesn't align with the function's contract. Please adjust this test to use a valid positive integer.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work! I am approving your submission. You've successfully addressed the feedback from the previous review by ensuring all test cases use valid positive integers. Your test suite is now comprehensive, covers all the requirements from the task description, and correctly validates the function's behavior. Great job!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.