Skip to content

Added task solution#92

Open
nikitachupahin wants to merge 2 commits intomate-academy:masterfrom
nikitachupahin:develop
Open

Added task solution#92
nikitachupahin wants to merge 2 commits intomate-academy:masterfrom
nikitachupahin:develop

Conversation

@nikitachupahin
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great work on this test suite! The tests are well-organized and cover most scenarios effectively. However, one critical change is needed. Your test in src/reduce.test.js for calling reduce on an empty array without an initial value expects undefined. The native Array.prototype.reduce method is required to throw a TypeError in this specific case. Please update your test to assert that a TypeError is thrown. You can accomplish this in Jest using expect(() => yourFunction()).toThrow(TypeError);.


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Important

Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.

Tip

If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.

Caution

Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

  2. Re-request AI review example

  3. Add AI review comments example

Comment on lines +132 to +137
it('should handle empty array', () => {
const actual = [].reduce2(mockReducer);

expect(mockReducer).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
expect(actual).toBeUndefined();
});

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test case doesn't align with the native Array.prototype.reduce behavior. When reduce is called on an empty array without an initial value, it should throw a TypeError. Your test should assert that an error is thrown, not that the result is undefined.

You can use expect(() => ...).toThrow(TypeError) to test for this.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Excellent work on this update! I'm happy to approve your changes. You've successfully addressed the feedback from the last review, and the test case for an empty array without an initial value now correctly asserts that a TypeError is thrown. Your implementation of reduce now perfectly mirrors the native method's behavior, and the test suite is comprehensive and robust. Keep up the great work!


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants