issue template: invite people to PR if they're up for it

[raboof]

Description

Highlight people comfortable with GitHub can also just PR.

Not sure how to test if this renders correctly tbh... maybe let's just try it.

Related issues

Discussed in #3329 (comment)

Role

Independent

[HarHarLinks]

technically our CONTENT.md speaks of requiring an accepted issue before implementation, however my tendency is to allow some leeway to ecosystem updates. the only contentious bit i see there is our unclear definition of what it means to support some of the named features, which however we should resolve anyway.

[raboof]

technically our CONTENT.md speaks of requiring an accepted issue before implementation

Actually it's https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix.org/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#how-we-take-decisions :)

I personally dislike such a rule, and prefer the "if you PR without creating an issue you risk us rejecting your PR, that's your risk" approach - but that's up to you of course.

the only contentious bit i see there is our unclear definition of what it means to support some of the named features, which however we should resolve anyway.

Yeah fair. Indeed ElementX does know about threads somewhat, but it's so basic I didn't feel comfortable suggesting that would be 'supported'. Maybe it would be good to have a 'somewhat (see comment)' option :D

[HarHarLinks]

The respective issue is #3230

[awtj8o81ryywg793]

Quoted from a previous comment:

I personally dislike such a rule, and prefer the "if you PR without creating an issue you risk us rejecting your PR, that's your risk" approach - but that's up to you of course.

I'm not against adopting such a change (or something similar) for pull requests that involve minor changes; it would help prevent situations like this from occurring. I also support clarifying when an issue is needed (e.g., for significant changes).