Fix commonjs module.exports= merging#27368
Merged
sandersn merged 1 commit intorelease-3.1from Sep 26, 2018
Merged
Conversation
I'm surprised we haven't seen more of this; I suspect it's because the mixed `module.exports=` + `export.foo=` pattern isn't that common. However, it'll happen any time that the exported symbol is unknown; getCommonJsExportEquals blithely clones unknownSymbol and proceeds to stick the `exports.foo=` properties onto it. This causes problems later, because the compiler checks for unknownSymbol with `===`. The fix is to not stick properties onto a clone of unknownSymbol. This makes the correct errors appear and removes the crash.
sheetalkamat
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2018
sandersn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2018
I'm surprised we haven't seen more of this; I suspect it's because the mixed `module.exports=` + `export.foo=` pattern isn't that common. However, it'll happen any time that the exported symbol is unknown; getCommonJsExportEquals blithely clones unknownSymbol and proceeds to stick the `exports.foo=` properties onto it. This causes problems later, because the compiler checks for unknownSymbol with `===`. The fix is to not stick properties onto a clone of unknownSymbol. This makes the correct errors appear and removes the crash.
sandersn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2018
I'm surprised we haven't seen more of this; I suspect it's because the mixed `module.exports=` + `export.foo=` pattern isn't that common. However, it'll happen any time that the exported symbol is unknown; getCommonJsExportEquals blithely clones unknownSymbol and proceeds to stick the `exports.foo=` properties onto it. This causes problems later, because the compiler checks for unknownSymbol with `===`. The fix is to not stick properties onto a clone of unknownSymbol. This makes the correct errors appear and removes the crash.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Whenever the exported symbol is unknown getCommonJsExportEquals blithely clones unknownSymbol and proceeds to stick the
exports.foo=properties onto it.This causes problems later, because the compiler checks for unknownSymbol with
===. The fix is to not stick properties onto a clone of unknownSymbol. This makes the correct errors appear and removesthe crash. Maybe we should consider supporting this pattern [1], but for now I think it's fine to issue an error on the unknown property.
Fixes #27025
[1] Call it "speculative export of a supposedly-global expando object", I guess. Makes it sound really appetising.