docs: Add Scaling AI Agents article to COMMUNITY.md#857
docs: Add Scaling AI Agents article to COMMUNITY.md#857lawcontinue wants to merge 3 commits intomicrosoft:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Welcome to the Agent Governance Toolkit! Thanks for your first pull request. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
documentation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 AI Agent: code-reviewer
Review Feedback for Pull Request: docs: Add Scaling AI Agents article to COMMUNITY.md
This pull request modifies only the COMMUNITY.md file to add a new article to the "Blog Posts & Articles" table. The change is straightforward and does not affect the core functionality, security, or backward compatibility of the repository.
Feedback
🔴 CRITICAL
No critical issues identified. This PR is limited to documentation changes.
🟡 WARNING
No breaking changes identified. The modification is non-functional and does not affect the public API or library behavior.
💡 SUGGESTION
-
Improve Link Target
The added article links to a GitHub Issue instead of a published blog post or article. While this may be intentional, it could be confusing for readers expecting a polished article. Consider linking to the actual article or blog post if available, or clarify in the table that the link points to a GitHub Issue.Example:
| [Scaling AI Agents from 10 to 10,000 — Governance Lessons from the Trenches](https://github.com/microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit/issues/699) (GitHub Issue) | [@lawcontinue](https://github.com/lawcontinue) | GitHub Issue |
-
Add Context for the Article
If the article is particularly relevant to a specific aspect of the toolkit (e.g., scaling, governance, or security), consider adding a brief description or annotation in the table to help readers understand its relevance. -
Check Consistency in Formatting
Ensure that the formatting of the table aligns with the rest of the entries. For example, the source column ("GitHub Issue") is consistent with other entries like "Dev.to."
Summary
This PR is clean and adheres to the repository's contribution guidelines. The change is limited to documentation and does not introduce any security risks, breaking changes, or functional modifications. Addressing the suggestions above will improve clarity and usability for readers.
This PR is approved for merging after considering the suggestions.
🤖 AI Agent: security-scanner — Security Analysis of Pull RequestSecurity Analysis of Pull RequestThis PR modifies only the Findings1. Prompt Injection Defense BypassRisk: None. 2. Policy Engine CircumventionRisk: None. 3. Trust Chain WeaknessesRisk: None. 4. Credential ExposureRisk: None. 5. Sandbox EscapeRisk: None. 6. Deserialization AttacksRisk: None. 7. Race ConditionsRisk: None. 8. Supply Chain RisksRisk: None. Additional Observations
Rating of FindingsNo security risks were identified in this PR. The changes are limited to documentation and spell-check configuration. Overall Risk Rating: 🔵 LOW Recommendations
No further action is required for this PR. |
|
Approved! But there's a merge conflict on COMMUNITY.md from #898 just merging. Please rebase on latest main and this merges immediately. |
|
Review: Changes Requested 🔄 Diff reviewed — 1-line addition to COMMUNITY.md. Scope matches description, docs-only. Two issues to resolve before merge:
Happy to merge once both are addressed! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 AI Agent: code-reviewer
Review of Pull Request: docs: Add Scaling AI Agents article to COMMUNITY.md
This PR is straightforward and only modifies the COMMUNITY.md file to add new entries to the "Blog Posts & Articles" table. Below is the review:
🔍 Focus Area Analysis
1. Policy Engine Correctness
No changes to the policy engine or code logic. Not applicable.
2. Trust/Identity
No cryptographic operations, credential handling, or SPIFFE/SVID-related changes. Not applicable.
3. Sandbox Escape Vectors
No code execution or sandbox-related changes. Not applicable.
4. Thread Safety
No concurrency-related changes. Not applicable.
5. OWASP Agentic Top 10 Compliance
The addition of the article "OWASP Agentic Top 10 — What Every AI Developer Should Know in 2026" is relevant to OWASP Agentic Top 10 compliance. This is a valuable resource for developers working on secure AI agents. 💡 SUGGESTION: Consider referencing this article in future security-related documentation or training materials.
6. Type Safety and Pydantic Model Validation
No changes to type safety or Pydantic models. Not applicable.
7. Backward Compatibility
No changes to the public API or functionality. Not applicable.
✅ Positive Observations
- The PR is clean and only modifies
COMMUNITY.md. - The added articles are relevant to the project and provide useful insights into governance, scaling, and security for AI agents.
- The PR resolves merge conflicts from the previous attempt (#820) and is based on the latest
mainbranch.
💡 Suggestions
- Content Categorization: Consider categorizing articles further (e.g., "Scaling", "Security", "Governance") to make the table easier to navigate as it grows.
- Internal Linking: If the repository has documentation on scaling or OWASP Agentic Top 10, link these articles directly from the relevant sections to provide additional context for users.
🟢 Approval
This PR is safe to merge. It does not introduce any breaking changes, security risks, or functional modifications. The added articles enhance the community resources and align well with the project's focus areas.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 AI Agent: code-reviewer
Review Summary
This pull request modifies the COMMUNITY.md file to add new entries to the "Blog Posts & Articles" table. The changes are straightforward and do not impact the core functionality, security, or backward compatibility of the repository. The PR is clean, well-documented, and adheres to the checklist provided.
Feedback
🔴 CRITICAL
No critical issues identified. This PR only modifies documentation.
🟡 WARNING
No breaking changes identified. The PR does not modify any public APIs or functionality.
💡 SUGGESTION
-
Content Validation: While the added links appear valid, it would be good to verify the authenticity and relevance of the articles to ensure they align with the repository's goals. This is particularly important for security-focused projects.
-
Sorting Order: Consider sorting the entries in the "Blog Posts & Articles" table alphabetically or by date to make it easier for readers to navigate the content.
-
Metadata Addition: If possible, include publication dates for the articles in the table to provide more context to readers about the timeliness of the content.
-
Contribution Guidelines: If not already present, consider adding guidelines for contributing to the
COMMUNITY.mdfile to ensure consistency in future additions.
Final Recommendation
This PR is safe to merge as it only modifies documentation. However, implementing the suggestions above could improve the organization and usability of the COMMUNITY.md file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 AI Agent: code-reviewer
Review Feedback for Pull Request: docs: Add Scaling AI Agents article to COMMUNITY.md
This PR is straightforward and only modifies the COMMUNITY.md file to add a new article to the "Blog Posts & Articles" table. Below is the review feedback:
✅ Code Quality and Correctness
- The change is clean and adheres to the existing format of the
COMMUNITY.mdfile. - The added article link and author information are correctly formatted and consistent with other entries in the table.
🔴 Security Issues
No security concerns are identified in this PR, as it only modifies documentation.
🟡 Potential Breaking Changes
No breaking changes are introduced in this PR, as it does not affect the codebase or public APIs.
💡 Suggestions
-
Enhance Context for Added Article: Consider adding a brief description of the article's relevance to the toolkit in the PR description. This helps reviewers understand why the article is valuable to the community.
- Example: "This article discusses scaling AI agents in large-scale deployments, which is relevant for users implementing governance in multi-agent systems."
-
Check for Dead Links: Ensure that the added link (
https://dev.to/zhangzeyu/scaling-ai-agents-from-10-to-10000-governance-lessons-from-the-trenches-31pd) is live and accessible. Dead links can reduce the quality of the documentation.
Final Recommendation
This PR is approved for merging as it meets all requirements and does not introduce any risks or breaking changes. Consider implementing the suggestions for future documentation updates.
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
lawcontinue
force-pushed
the
issue-699-community-entry-v2
branch
from
8239e0b to
f43b2cd
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 AI Agent: code-reviewer
Review Feedback for PR: docs: Add Scaling AI Agents article to COMMUNITY.md
This PR modifies only the COMMUNITY.md file and adds new entries to the "Blog Posts & Articles" section. The changes are straightforward and do not impact the codebase or functionality. Below is the review feedback:
🔴 CRITICAL
No critical issues identified.
🟡 WARNING
No breaking changes detected.
💡 SUGGESTION
-
Clarify Stack Overflow Tag Status
The comment about the Stack Overflow tag being "not yet created" could be misleading for contributors or users. Consider adding a timeline or action plan for creating the tag, or removing the commented-out line entirely until the tag is available.<!-- Stack Overflow tag not yet created - **[Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/agent-governance-toolkit)** — Technical Q&A (tag: `agent-governance-toolkit`) -->💡 Suggested Change:
Replace the comment with:<!-- Stack Overflow tag will be created once community adoption increases --> -
Alphabetical Order for Blog Posts
To improve readability and maintain consistency, consider sorting the entries in the "Blog Posts & Articles" table alphabetically by title or author. This will make it easier for users to locate specific articles. -
Verify Author Attribution
Ensure that the attribution for the new articles (e.g.,[@lawcontinue](https://github.com/lawcontinue)) is accurate and aligns with the GitHub profiles of the authors. This avoids potential misattribution. -
Add Context for OWASP Agentic Top 10 Article
The OWASP Agentic Top 10 article is highly relevant to the repository's focus on security. Consider highlighting its significance in the README or other documentation to encourage users to explore it.
Additional Notes
-
The
.cspell-repo-terms.txtfile was updated to include the termlawcontinue. This is a minor change and does not impact functionality. However, ensure that the term is relevant and necessary for spell-checking in the repository. -
The PR supersedes #820 and resolves merge conflicts. This is a good practice and demonstrates proper version control hygiene.
Recommendation
Approve the PR after addressing the suggestions above. The changes are minimal, documentation-focused, and do not introduce risks to the repository.
|
@lawcontinue This PR has merge conflicts. COMMUNITY.md has been updated by other merged PRs. Please rebase onto latest main. You can run: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 AI Agent: code-reviewer
Review Feedback for PR: docs: Add Scaling AI Agents article to COMMUNITY.md
This PR is straightforward and only modifies the COMMUNITY.md file to add a new article to the Community section. After reviewing the changes, here is the feedback:
✅ Review Summary
- The PR is clean and adheres to the stated scope (modifies only
COMMUNITY.md). - The added article is relevant to the repository's focus on agent governance and security.
- The formatting of the table is consistent with the existing entries.
- The PR is based on the latest
upstream/mainand has no merge conflicts.
Feedback
🔴 CRITICAL
No critical issues identified.
🟡 WARNING
No potential breaking changes identified.
💡 SUGGESTION
-
Improve Article Categorization: Consider adding tags or categories to the articles in the
COMMUNITY.mdfile (e.g., "Governance," "Security," "Compliance") to make it easier for users to find relevant content. This could be helpful as the list grows. -
Validation of External Links: While the links appear valid, it is a good practice to periodically validate external links to ensure they remain accessible. Consider adding a CI job to check for broken links in documentation files.
-
Contributor Recognition: The article is authored by
@lawcontinue. Consider adding a "Contributors" section to theCOMMUNITY.mdfile to recognize authors who have contributed valuable content.
Action Items
- Consider adding categories or tags to the articles for better organization.
- Explore adding a CI job to validate external links in documentation files.
- Optionally, add a "Contributors" section to
COMMUNITY.md.
Approval
This PR is approved for merging as it meets all the requirements and does not introduce any security or breaking changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 AI Agent: code-reviewer
Feedback on Pull Request: docs: Add Scaling AI Agents article to COMMUNITY.md
🔍 Review Summary
This pull request modifies the COMMUNITY.md file to add a new article to the "Blog Posts & Articles" table. The change is straightforward and does not impact the codebase or functionality of the repository. However, I will review the diff for potential issues related to documentation integrity, consistency, and repository standards.
🔴 CRITICAL
No critical security issues identified. The PR only modifies documentation and does not interact with the codebase.
🟡 WARNING
No breaking changes detected. This PR does not affect the public API or functionality of the repository.
💡 SUGGESTIONS
-
Ensure Consistency in Author Attribution
The table entry for the new article uses the GitHub handle@lawcontinuefor the author. Ensure that this attribution is accurate and consistent with other entries. If the author has multiple aliases or handles, consider standardizing the format across the table. -
Verify External Links
The added link points to an article hosted on Dev.to. While the link appears valid, it is good practice to verify that the URL is active and leads to the intended content. Broken links can degrade the user experience. -
Update Repository Terms in
.cspell-repo-terms.txt
The diff includes updates to.cspell-repo-terms.txt, adding terms such asLandlock,seccomp, andsyscall. While these additions are unrelated to the main change, they appear relevant to the repository's scope (security and sandboxing). Consider documenting why these terms were added in the commit message for better traceability. -
Consider Adding Context to the Article
While the article title is descriptive, adding a brief summary or annotation in the table could help readers understand its relevance to the toolkit. For example:| [Scaling AI Agents from 10 to 10,000 — Governance Lessons from the Trenches](https://dev.to/zhangzeyu/scaling-ai-agents-from-10-to-10000-governance-lessons-from-the-trenches-31pd) | [@lawcontinue](https://github.com/lawcontinue) | Dev.to | Lessons learned from scaling AI agents in production environments. |
-
Check for Duplicate Entries
Ensure that the added article is not already present in the table under a different title or link. Duplicate entries can confuse readers and clutter the documentation. -
Consider Adding Tags or Categories
To improve discoverability, consider adding tags or categories to the articles listed in the table. For example, this article could be tagged with "scalability" or "governance."
✅ Review Checklist
- Documentation change only, no code modifications.
- Based on the latest upstream/main branch.
- No merge conflicts.
- Table formatting is consistent with existing entries.
- External link appears valid.
Final Recommendation
This pull request is approved with minor suggestions for improvement. If possible, address the suggestions to enhance the quality and usability of the documentation.
|
@lawcontinue please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.
Contributor License AgreementContribution License AgreementThis Contribution License Agreement (“Agreement”) is agreed to by the party signing below (“You”),
|
|
Hi @imran-siddique, I've rebased the branch onto the latest upstream main. Both COMMUNITY.md and .cspell-repo-terms.txt have been updated to reflect the current state. The merge conflicts should now be resolved. Ready for review! |
|
agree
…---Original---
From: ***@***.***>
Date: Mon, Apr 13, 2026 00:25 AM
To: ***@***.***>;
Cc: ***@***.******@***.***>;
Subject: Re: [microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit] docs: Add Scaling AI Agents article to COMMUNITY.md (PR #857)
microsoft-github-policy-service[bot] left a comment (microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit#857)
@lawcontinue please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]
Options:
(default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree
(when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft" Contributor License Agreement
Contribution License Agreement
This Contribution License Agreement (“Agreement”) is agreed to by the party signing below (“You”),
and conveys certain license rights to Microsoft Corporation and its affiliates (“Microsoft”) for Your
contributions to Microsoft open source projects. This Agreement is effective as of the latest signature
date below.
Definitions.
“Code” means the computer software code, whether in human-readable or machine-executable form,
that is delivered by You to Microsoft under this Agreement.
“Project” means any of the projects owned or managed by Microsoft and offered under a license
approved by the Open Source Initiative (www.opensource.org).
“Submit” is the act of uploading, submitting, transmitting, or distributing code or other content to any
Project, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control
systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Project for the purpose of
discussing and improving that Project, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or
otherwise designated in writing by You as “Not a Submission.”
“Submission” means the Code and any other copyrightable material Submitted by You, including any
associated comments and documentation.
Your Submission. You must agree to the terms of this Agreement before making a Submission to any
Project. This Agreement covers any and all Submissions that You, now or in the future (except as
described in Section 4 below), Submit to any Project.
Originality of Work. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work.
Should You wish to Submit materials that are not Your original work, You may Submit them separately
to the Project if You (a) retain all copyright and license information that was in the materials as You
received them, (b) in the description accompanying Your Submission, include the phrase “Submission
containing materials of a third party:” followed by the names of the third party and any licenses or other
restrictions of which You are aware, and (c) follow any other instructions in the Project’s written
guidelines concerning Submissions.
Your Employer. References to “employer” in this Agreement include Your employer or anyone else
for whom You are acting in making Your Submission, e.g. as a contractor, vendor, or agent. If Your
Submission is made in the course of Your work for an employer or Your employer has intellectual
property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable law, You must secure permission from Your
employer to make the Submission before signing this Agreement. In that case, the term “You” in this
Agreement will refer to You and the employer collectively. If You change employers in the future and
desire to Submit additional Submissions for the new employer, then You agree to sign a new Agreement
and secure permission from the new employer before Submitting those Submissions.
Licenses.
Copyright License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license in the
Submission to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute
the Submission and such derivative works, and to sublicense any or all of the foregoing rights to third
parties.
Patent License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license under
Your patent claims that are necessarily infringed by the Submission or the combination of the
Submission with the Project to which it was Submitted to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell and
import or otherwise dispose of the Submission alone or with the Project.
Other Rights Reserved. Each party reserves all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
No additional licenses or rights whatsoever (including, without limitation, any implied licenses) are
granted by implication, exhaustion, estoppel or otherwise.
Representations and Warranties. You represent that You are legally entitled to grant the above
licenses. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work (except as You may
have disclosed under Section 3). You represent that You have secured permission from Your employer to
make the Submission in cases where Your Submission is made in the course of Your work for Your
employer or Your employer has intellectual property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable
law. If You are signing this Agreement on behalf of Your employer, You represent and warrant that You
have the necessary authority to bind the listed employer to the obligations contained in this Agreement.
You are not expected to provide support for Your Submission, unless You choose to do so. UNLESS
REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING, AND EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES
EXPRESSLY STATED IN SECTIONS 3, 4, AND 6, THE SUBMISSION PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS
PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTY OF
NONINFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Notice to Microsoft. You agree to notify Microsoft in writing of any facts or circumstances of which
You later become aware that would make Your representations in this Agreement inaccurate in any
respect.
Information about Submissions. You agree that contributions to Projects and information about
contributions may be maintained indefinitely and disclosed publicly, including Your name and other
information that You submit with Your Submission.
Governing Law/Jurisdiction. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington, and
the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the federal courts sitting in King County,
Washington, unless no federal subject matter jurisdiction exists, in which case the parties consent to
exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the Superior Court of King County, Washington. The parties waive all
defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non-conveniens.
Entire Agreement/Assignment. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, and
supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings or communications, written or oral, between
the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be assigned by Microsoft.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
2 participants
Summary
Adds the "Scaling AI Agents from 10 to 10,000 — Governance Lessons from the Trenches" article to the Community section.
Context
This PR supersedes #820, which had merge conflicts with latest main (89 conflict files). This PR is based on the latest upstream/main and only modifies COMMUNITY.md.
Changes
Checklist