docs(q-and-a): add 12 Kognitos-point cross-references#5
Open
smuchow1962 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
… new rows) Apply 14 operations from the 2026-05-20 Kognitos 12-point audit cycle. Tag format: (kognitos point N) — lowercase, integer N, end of Answer cell. Tag-adds (5) to existing rows: - Point 8 — line 213 (Consumer access: adverse-action principal reasons) - Point 11 — line 187 (Privacy: Article 22) - Point 11 — line 294 (Vendor management: human-override path) - Point 12 — line 38 (Tamper-detection lead row) + Rosanne tail-sentence pointing at §10.53/§10.54/§4.1.3 so a post-quantum-aware reader doesn't read the present-tense integrity claim as time-invariant - Point 12 — line 46 (Tamper-detection: opposing-counsel attack row) New rows (9), Variant A for Points 3 and 10: - Point 1 — NTP-synced UTC timestamp → Implementation theme - Point 2 — Unique decision ID → Implementation theme - Point 3 (Variant A) — Authenticated human user identity → Audit committee - Point 4 — AI system identity and version → MRM theme - Point 5 — Model identity and version → MRM theme - Point 6 — Inputs received with source attribution → MRM theme - Point 7 — Specific policy / rule / prompt invoked → Crypto discipline theme - Point 8 — Hash-vs-plaintext epistemic scope → Privacy theme - Point 9 — Output produced (stream-finish binding) → Tamper-detection theme - Point 10 (Variant A) — Action in downstream systems → Legal evidentiary Placement: Option A (distributed by theme), preserving role-affinity scan. No introductory paragraph about Kognitos per Steve's directive. Boundary-of-the-claim discipline baked into every drafted cell. Variant B for Points 3 and 10 follows after PRD-3 lands Seam D (audit.actor.*) and the audit.downstream_action.* family. Source-of-record for the operations: E:/dev/MMP.Media/_assistant_drafts/wiki/market-research/ 2026-05-20-CONSOLIDATED-kognitos-qa-pack-for-steve.md Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Apply 14 operations from the 2026-05-20 Kognitos 12-point audit cycle to
docs/q-and-a.md. Tag format is(kognitos point N)— lowercase, integer N, single space separators, end of Answer cell.Placement follows Option A — distributed by theme to preserve the role-affinity scan. No introductory paragraph about Kognitos per Steve's directive (the parentheticals stand on their own). Boundary-of-the-claim discipline is baked into every drafted cell (institution-side dependencies, epistemic scope, temporal scope named where applicable).
The Point 12 lead-row tag-add also carries Rosanne's tail-sentence pointing at §10.53 / §10.54 / §4.1.3 so a post-quantum-aware reader doesn't read the present-tense integrity claim as time-invariant.
Theme placement
Variant B follow-on
Points 3 and 10 ship Variant A today. Variant B follows after PRD-3 lands the Seam D
audit.actor.*family and theaudit.downstream_action.*family.Downstream
The herald-website auto-mirrors
docs/q-and-a.mdintoweb/src/content/mrm-spec/docs/q-and-a.mdviaweb/scripts/sync-mrm-spec.cjs. The/mrm/docs/q-and-apage picks up the new rows at the next build. No additional website work needed — Dawn confirmed in her dispatch.Source of record
All cell text was lifted verbatim from the consolidated pack:
E:\dev\MMP.Media\_assistant_drafts\wiki\market-research\2026-05-20-CONSOLIDATED-kognitos-qa-pack-for-steve.md(the "14 operations" section)That pack composed work from Pearl (12-field schema), Richard (coverage audit), Rosanne (seam inventory + falsification cross-check), and Laura (CHANGELOG narrative for the 4 separate spec changes).
Test plan
docs/q-and-a.mdrenders cleanly in GitHub's markdown preview (no broken table rows)(kognitos point N)(currently: 15 instances across 14 operations; Point 8 appears twice by design — once tag-add, once new row)npm run sync-mrm-spec+ build picks up the new rows/mrm/docs/q-and-astill works against the new rows (their audience icons compose with the existing role-filter toolbar)