Replace old random with rand()#122
Open
ghost wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
In light of the worldgen potential issue, can we see some before and after world gen images? |
Collaborator
|
@Daeskmoor Would love to see this merged. Can we get some sample worldgen images to be sure there is no change there? |
nedbrek
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2021
nedbrek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This attempts to achieve 'true random' by using the standard rand() used in the 'modern c++' of 8 years ago as opposed to the magical algorithm used prior.