fix(tmux): use pane PID to find correct opencode server port#119
Open
PhantomYdn wants to merge 1 commit intonickjvandyke:mainfrom
Open
fix(tmux): use pane PID to find correct opencode server port#119PhantomYdn wants to merge 1 commit intonickjvandyke:mainfrom
PhantomYdn wants to merge 1 commit intonickjvandyke:mainfrom
Conversation
When multiple opencode instances share the same CWD, the previous CWD-based discovery could select the wrong instance. This was particularly problematic with tmux provider since opencode processes spawned via tmux are not descendants of Neovim. Changes: - Add get_port() method to provider interface - Implement get_port() for tmux provider using pane PID tracing - Add process utilities (get_descendants, get_listening_port) - Check provider's get_port() before falling back to CWD discovery - Other providers return nil (fallback to existing behavior) Fixes nickjvandyke#118
3 tasks
Owner
|
Thanks for proofing this out! I think it's the correct solution for #118. I hope to review it soon. I'm also curious which other providers could surface their |
nickjvandyke
force-pushed
the
main
branch
6 times, most recently
from
de5f1cc to
5de2380
Compare
nickjvandyke
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
1 task
nickjvandyke
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2026
…e server option The plugin's purpose is _interfacing_ with `opencode` - running it is just a neat convenience. But as the plugin has grown (yay!), that "neat convenience" has become endless quirks and the majority of maintenance work. Unfortunately, I'm forced to make the difficult call to remove providers to make time for more useful work. I retained the embedded terminal (and instructions to integrate e.g. `snacks.terminal`) because it's useful to have _some_ way to get started. But beyond that, it's not practical to service every user's preferences. And anyway, it's bad UX to ask them to understand a new way of using/configuring their terminal environment. It may make sense as its own plugin (and feel free to extract the code for that!), but as far as `opencode.nvim` goes, it is far, far out of scope. Thank you for understanding! I look forward to bringing you more cool features :D #118 #180 #166 #104 #150 #119 #105
nickjvandyke
force-pushed
the
main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
66f04d7 to
a4dff90
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When multiple opencode instances share the same CWD, the previous CWD-based discovery could select the wrong instance. This was particularly problematic with tmux provider since opencode processes spawned via tmux are not descendants of Neovim.
Changes:
Fixes #118