chore: release v0.14.0#364
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Tiwari <vaibhav.tiwari33@gmail.com>
vaibhavtiwari33
requested review from
BulkBeing,
kohlisid and
vigith
as code owners
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #364 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.74% 92.74%
=======================================
Files 67 67
Lines 3540 3540
Branches 232 232
=======================================
Hits 3283 3283
Misses 191 191
Partials 66 66 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@vaibhavtiwari33 will 0.14.x work with 1.7.x of Numaflow? |
Except for accumulator, everything else will work |
|
I had tested udsource, map, and udsink with numaflow v1.8 for this compatibility matrix. I should include a pipeline that contains all components for compatibility testing. |
that won't work. we need to give users an upgrade path. We cannot say we have to deploy both together. Numaflow and UDF deployments are decoupled. |
vigith
dismissed
their stale review
We need to give users an upgrade path. Either the SDK or Numaflow should be backward compatible.
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Tiwari <vaibhav.tiwari33@gmail.com>
|
So, overall for accumulator in python SDK we have the following mapping between SDK and core versions:
|
Cool, this works. /cc @th0ger |
2 participants
No description provided.