Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 513: Use of a broken or weak cryptographic hashing algorithm on sensitive data #2401
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/opea-project/GenAIExamples/security/code-scanning/513
In general, to fix this type of issue you should not use a fast, general‑purpose hash (like SHA‑256) directly on secrets that function as passwords or authentication tokens. Instead, use a password hashing/KDF algorithm that is intentionally slow and parameterizable (e.g., Argon2, bcrypt, PBKDF2). This makes brute‑force attacks on stolen hashes significantly harder.
In this file, the simplest, least‑disruptive fix is to reuse the existing
passlibCryptContextinstance (pwd_context) already configured withbcryptfor passwords. That ensures API keys and passwords both use a computationally expensive, salted hash, and we don’t introduce new external dependencies or concepts. Concretely:hash_api_keyto callpwd_context.hash(api_key)instead ofhashlib.sha256(...).verify_api_keyto callpwd_context.verify(api_key, hashed_key)instead of recomputing SHA‑256 and comparing.pwd_contextand its imports already exist at the top ofsecurity.py, so no new imports or helper functions are required. The changes are confined to lines 115–122 inCogniwareIms/backend/app/core/security.py.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.