Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A chaotic evil developer decided to use new allocators as some sort of memory getter. Long story sort this code is cursed and doesn't match.
This function doesn't initialize the memory at all. It just builds the linked list. For this reason I decided to use reinterpret cast to transform the work buffer into something we can use. This also fully matches the function.
Ideally the Node should have a variable size. So all operations lineup perfectly but c++ doesn't support dynamic arrays.
Proof of work ->https://decomp.me/scratch/L2Yrq
This change is