Skip to content

8375549: ConcurrentModificationException if jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms has multiple entries with known oid#3220

Open
TheMangovnik wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:pr/3213from
TheMangovnik:backport/JDK-8375549-real
Open

8375549: ConcurrentModificationException if jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms has multiple entries with known oid#3220
TheMangovnik wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:pr/3213from
TheMangovnik:backport/JDK-8375549-real

Conversation

@TheMangovnik

@TheMangovnik TheMangovnik commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of JDK-8375549 - ConcurrentModificationException if jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms has multiple entries with known oid

I started doing this backport since it is marked as critical in JBS and it is also in oracle Java 11, however I was unable to reproduced the described exception in jdk11 when running the reproducer program attached in relevant JBS issue (but I was able to reproduce the issue in jdk17).

Tests

Tests were run on Fedora 44.

Extra tests - PASSING

==============================
Test summary
==============================
   TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR
   jtreg:test/jdk/javax/crypto/Cipher/TestDisabledWithOids.java
                                                         1     1     0     0
==============================
TEST SUCCESS
  • This is new test introduced in this backport.

sun/security - MIXED

==============================
Test summary
==============================
   TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR
>> jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security                         677   676     1     0 <<
==============================
TEST FAILURE
  • The failing test is sun/security/ssl/X509KeyManager/PreferredKey.java, which is unrelated to this backport.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8375549 needs maintainer approval

Integration blocker

 ⚠️ Dependency #3213 must be integrated first

Issue

  • JDK-8375549: ConcurrentModificationException if jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms has multiple entries with known oid (Bug - P2)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3220/head:pull/3220
$ git checkout pull/3220

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3220
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3220/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3220

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3220

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3220.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper

bridgekeeper Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Welcome back TheMangovnik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/3213 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk Bot changed the title backport af09b7a5182788bc4f29f9df4a92b2e26bf76e46 8375549: ConcurrentModificationException if jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms has multiple entries with known oid Jun 3, 2026
@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 3, 2026
@mlbridge

mlbridge Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Webrevs

@gnu-andrew

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/reviewers 1 reviewer

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gnu-andrew
Warning: By issuing the /reviewers command in this clean backport pull request, the reviewers check has now been enabled.
The total number of required reviews for this PR (including the jcheck configuration and the last /reviewers command) is now set to 1 (with at least 1 Reviewer).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants