Skip to content

CORENET-7234: Update OWNERS file#118

Open
raphaelvrosa wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
raphaelvrosa:CORENET-7234
Open

CORENET-7234: Update OWNERS file#118
raphaelvrosa wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
raphaelvrosa:CORENET-7234

Conversation

@raphaelvrosa

@raphaelvrosa raphaelvrosa commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the project's code review and approval configuration.

Signed-off-by: Raphael Rosa <raprosa@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@raphaelvrosa: This pull request references CORENET-7234 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 6dedd056-2092-4d0d-9372-191a93a584ea

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12d99f3 and 845c255.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS

Walkthrough

The OWNERS file was updated to modify project team membership. The reviewers list was revised by removing five previous members and adding four new members while keeping three existing reviewers. The approvers list was similarly updated to six members, reflecting leadership changes in the multus-admission-controller project.

Changes

OWNERS file update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Reviewers and approvers update
OWNERS
reviewers list updated by removing dougbtv, zshi, s1061123, aneeshkp, pliurh and adding taanyas, raphaelvrosa, SchSeba, danwinship, LionelJouin while retaining fepan, jeremyeder, bpickard22. approvers list narrowed to LionelJouin, danwinship, SchSeba, fepan, jeremyeder, bpickard22.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Test Structure And Quality ⚠️ Warning Test code added in PR lacks meaningful assertion failure messages - all 11 Expect() assertions omit optional message parameters needed for diagnostics. Add failure messages to all Expect() calls: e.g., Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred(), "failed to create pod") to help diagnose test failures.
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: updating the OWNERS file with new reviewer and approver entries. It is concise, clear, and directly related to the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed All Ginkgo test names use stable, deterministic static strings. No dynamic content like timestamps, UUIDs, pod names, or node names found in test titles.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The PR adds Ginkgo unit tests (not e2e tests) that only use standard Kubernetes APIs. The MicroShift compatibility check applies to e2e tests; these are unit tests.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only updates OWNERS file; no new Ginkgo e2e tests are added, so SNO compatibility check is not applicable.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed This PR only updates the OWNERS file with new reviewers/approvers; it does not modify deployment manifests, operator code, or controllers, so the topology-aware scheduling check is not applicable.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed PR only updates OWNERS and config files; no code changes that could write to stdout at process level, making OTE Binary Stdout Contract check inapplicable.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed This PR only modifies the OWNERS file to update reviewer and approver lists. No new Ginkgo e2e tests were added, so the IPv6/disconnected network check does not apply.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR only modifies OWNERS file (configuration); no code changes or crypto-related implementations are present or modified.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed PR only updates OWNERS file; no container/K8s manifest changes. Existing deployment manifests lack privileged settings.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed The PR only modifies the OWNERS file (metadata with GitHub usernames). Existing logging code contains no sensitive data exposure patterns and the PR makes no changes to logging statements.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from aneeshkp and jeremyeder June 5, 2026 15:02
@bpickard22

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@bpickard22

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 5, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bpickard22, raphaelvrosa

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bpickard22, raphaelvrosa

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 5, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@raphaelvrosa: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security 845c255 link false /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants