Skip to content

CORENET-7233: Update OWNERS file#304

Open
raphaelvrosa wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
raphaelvrosa:CORENET-7233
Open

CORENET-7233: Update OWNERS file#304
raphaelvrosa wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
raphaelvrosa:CORENET-7233

Conversation

@raphaelvrosa

@raphaelvrosa raphaelvrosa commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated repository ownership: reviewer and approver lists were revised to reflect a new set of maintainers.
    • No changes to functionality or configuration visible to end users; this only affects internal review and approval workflows.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@raphaelvrosa: This pull request references CORENET-7233 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 7aa381d8-3a67-442e-8a67-b78b8ede9da8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c4afa47 and e27fdd7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • OWNERS

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the OWNERS file in the multus-cni repository, replacing the reviewer and approver roster entries. The reviewers list is changed to a new set of seven names, while the approvers list is narrowed to five names. Component and subcomponent metadata remain unchanged.

Changes

Ownership Metadata Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update reviewer and approver assignments
OWNERS
The reviewers list is replaced with a new roster including taanyas, raphaelvrosa, maiqueb, LionelJouin, danwinship, SchSeba, fepan, and bpickard22. The approvers list is updated to include only maiqueb, LionelJouin, danwinship, SchSeba, fepan, and bpickard22. Component and subcomponent metadata remain unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: updating the OWNERS file with new reviewer and approver lists.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed All 20 new Ginkgo test files use stable, deterministic test names. No fmt.Sprintf, dynamic values, or variable concatenation found in test titles.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed The PR only modifies the OWNERS file (updating reviewer and approver lists). No Ginkgo test files were added or modified, so the "Test Structure and Quality" check is not applicable to this PR.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only updates the OWNERS file metadata; no new Ginkgo e2e tests are added, so the MicroShift test compatibility check is not applicable.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR modifies OWNERS file only. No new OpenShift e2e tests added. Unit test files added are not SNO-applicable. Check is not relevant.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only modifies the OWNERS metadata file. No deployment manifests, operator code, controllers, or scheduling constraints are changed, so the topology-aware scheduling check is not applicable.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed This is Multus CNI, a Kubernetes networking plugin, not an OpenShift Test Extension binary. The OTE Stdout Contract check is inapplicable to non-OTE projects.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR updates OWNERS file metadata only. No new Ginkgo e2e tests are being added. Check applies to Ginkgo e2e tests (It(), Describe(), etc.), not unit tests or shell script e2e infrastructure.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR only modifies OWNERS file with reviewer/approver names; contains no code changes, cryptographic algorithms, or security-relevant constructs.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed The PR only modifies the OWNERS file (a code review metadata file) with reviewer/approver lists. No container or K8s manifests with privileged settings are present.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed The PR only updates the OWNERS file with public usernames and metadata; no logging statements exposing passwords, tokens, API keys, PII, or other sensitive data are present.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from bpickard22 and dougbtv June 5, 2026 15:25
Signed-off-by: Raphael Rosa <raprosa@redhat.com>
@bpickard22

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@bpickard22

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 5, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bpickard22, raphaelvrosa

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 5, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@raphaelvrosa: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security e27fdd7 link false /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants