Skip to content

chore(ci): tests with additional ec kas#746

Draft
elizabethhealy wants to merge 8 commits intomainfrom
dspx-2445-higher-ec-curve-tests
Draft

chore(ci): tests with additional ec kas#746
elizabethhealy wants to merge 8 commits intomainfrom
dspx-2445-higher-ec-curve-tests

Conversation

@elizabethhealy
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @elizabethhealy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request expands the end-to-end test suite by adding new scenarios to validate TDF3 encryption and decryption with different key wrapping algorithms. It also includes necessary cleanup mechanisms to maintain test environment integrity after these new tests are executed.

Highlights

  • New E2E Tests: Introduced two new end-to-end tests for TDF3 encryption and decryption, specifically covering EC-wrapping with P-384 and RSA-wrapping algorithms.
  • Test Cleanup Enhancement: Added robust cleanup logic to the teardown function to ensure that KAS registry keys and KAS instances created during the new tests are properly removed, preventing test environment pollution.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • e2e/encrypt-decrypt.bats
    • Added cleanup logic for P384 and RSA test KAS entries and instances in the teardown function.
    • Introduced a new test case for TDF3 roundtrip with EC-wrapping P-384.
    • Introduced a new test case for TDF3 roundtrip with RSA-wrapping.
Ignored Files
  • Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (1)
    • .github/workflows/ci.yaml
Activity
  • The pull request was created by elizabethhealy.
  • No human activity (comments, reviews) has been recorded on this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds end-to-end tests for TDF3 roundtrip encryption and decryption using EC P-384 and RSA wrapping. A critical security concern has been identified: the security analysis could not be performed on e2e/encrypt-decrypt.bats because the file content was empty, preventing a full security assessment. Additionally, the review suggests improving maintainability by refactoring duplicated logic in the new test code and the teardown function, which also addresses a potential copy-paste bug.

@github-actions
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link

X-Test Failure Report

bats-test-results
✅ js-main
✅ js-v0.9.0
✅ java-main

@github-actions
Copy link

X-Test Failure Report

bats-test-results
✅ js-main
✅ js-v0.9.0

@elizabethhealy
Copy link
Member Author

@github-actions
Copy link

X-Test Failure Report

bats-test-results
✅ js-main
✅ js-v0.9.0

@elizabethhealy
Copy link
Member Author

@github-actions
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant