chore(ci): flakiness in key mappings list pagination test part 2#754
chore(ci): flakiness in key mappings list pagination test part 2#754jakedoublev merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @jakedoublev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request aims to enhance the stability of the continuous integration (CI) pipeline by addressing a known flakiness issue within the key mappings list pagination end-to-end test. The changes simplify the test logic to make it more robust against variations in test data or environment, thereby improving the reliability of automated checks. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request addresses flakiness in a pagination test by simplifying it. While the change successfully removes the source of flakiness, it also significantly reduces the test's coverage of the pagination functionality. My review includes a suggestion to restore more thorough pagination testing in a way that avoids the original flakiness.
No description provided.