Skip to content

chore(ci): flakiness in key mappings list pagination test part 2#754

Merged
jakedoublev merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/DSPX-2367
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

chore(ci): flakiness in key mappings list pagination test part 2#754
jakedoublev merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/DSPX-2367

Conversation

@jakedoublev
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jakedoublev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to enhance the stability of the continuous integration (CI) pipeline by addressing a known flakiness issue within the key mappings list pagination end-to-end test. The changes simplify the test logic to make it more robust against variations in test data or environment, thereby improving the reliability of automated checks.

Highlights

  • Pagination Test Simplification: The list key mappings with pagination test in e2e/kas-keys-mappings.bats has been refactored to reduce flakiness. It now only verifies the first page of results, ensuring a single key mapping is returned and its kid is not null, instead of asserting specific kid values across multiple offsets.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • e2e/kas-keys-mappings.bats
    • Simplified the list key mappings with pagination test to reduce flakiness by focusing on the first page of results and general data presence rather than specific item IDs across multiple pages.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses flakiness in a pagination test by simplifying it. While the change successfully removes the source of flakiness, it also significantly reduces the test's coverage of the pagination functionality. My review includes a suggestion to restore more thorough pagination testing in a way that avoids the original flakiness.

@jakedoublev jakedoublev marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2026 21:52
@jakedoublev jakedoublev requested a review from a team as a code owner February 19, 2026 21:52
@jakedoublev jakedoublev enabled auto-merge (squash) February 19, 2026 21:52
@github-actions
Copy link

@jakedoublev jakedoublev merged commit d6e08f4 into main Feb 19, 2026
20 checks passed
@jakedoublev jakedoublev deleted the fix/DSPX-2367 branch February 19, 2026 22:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants