Skip to content

Create 2026 Q2 TAC Report for Global Cyber Policy WG#618

Open
torgo wants to merge 8 commits into
ossf:mainfrom
torgo:patch-4
Open

Create 2026 Q2 TAC Report for Global Cyber Policy WG#618
torgo wants to merge 8 commits into
ossf:mainfrom
torgo:patch-4

Conversation

@torgo

@torgo torgo commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Added the 2026 Q2 TAC Report for the Global Cyber Policy Working Group, detailing the group's activities, structure, and ongoing projects.

Added the 2026 Q2 TAC Report for the Global Cyber Policy Working Group, detailing the group's activities, structure, and ongoing projects.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
@torgo torgo requested a review from a team as a code owner June 2, 2026 14:03
@torgo torgo marked this pull request as draft June 2, 2026 14:03
Added a note about the creation of a physical 'CRA-Fish' mascot by the OpenSSF team.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
Comment thread TI-reports/2026/2026-Q2-GCP-WG.md Outdated
Comment thread TI-reports/2026/2026-Q2-GCP-WG.md Outdated
Comment thread TI-reports/2026/2026-Q2-GCP-WG.md

The awareness SIG is led by [Megan Knight](https://github.com/businesscasualkesha) of Arm. The scope is activities that drive awareness of the work of this group and of the regulatory landscape in general. The SIG has been marshalling blog posts and the upcoming conference schedule. The Awareness SIG minutes are kept in the [main working group minutes document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iAplSQheMgemdMnEw74uPj3oi_6rLLbFFXhg4svqIDo/edit).

Activities and Publications:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I propose to delete this Activities and Publications section. I think we captured all relevant updates above. I've scanned Notes doc and didn't find anything to add...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@torgo propose to DELETE Lines 51-54. Because we're mentioning key outcomes in the bullet points up there ^^

Comment thread TI-reports/2026/2026-Q2-GCP-WG.md Outdated
torgo and others added 3 commits June 5, 2026 15:36
Co-authored-by: Roman Zhukov <rzhukov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
Co-authored-by: Roman Zhukov <rzhukov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
Co-authored-by: Roman Zhukov <rzhukov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>

[all needs an edit]

* we held xx tech talks:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

need something here

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think Roman already mentioned the one from April the upcoming one

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@torgo yes, Madalin is correct, I just roll everything up into bullet points (Line 29-35) ^^.
So, propose to DELETE Lines 36-47.


The SIG's main work this year has been on raising awareness of relevant standards efforts, disseminating information to members about these efforts, and highligting when public consultations are open / helping members participate in these consultations.

The SIG's main work this year has been on raising awareness of relevant standards efforts, disseminating information to members about these efforts, and highligting when public consultations are open / helping members participate in these consultations.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there is a duplication between lines 60 and 62

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added already to my comment ^^ @torgo


The SIG's main work this year has been on raising awareness of relevant standards efforts, disseminating information to members about these efforts, and highligting when public consultations are open / helping members participate in these consultations.

We are developing [Comments to the draft Communication on Commission guidance on the application of the CRA](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UNVJ5o3snT1oV_bqLWSmlBYm1DCvysQJcwvBszPjzes/edit)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added already to my comment ^^ @torgo

Comment thread TI-reports/2026/2026-Q2-GCP-WG.md Outdated
Comment thread TI-reports/2026/2026-Q2-GCP-WG.md

- we developed [CRA Guidelines for Maintainers and Developers](https://policy.openssf.org/CRA/maintainers.html) which is getting adoption (1 example - by Sylva project)
- we're doing a "CRA Roadshow" for communities to help navigating CRA, recently - for Yocto project and its members with an amazing feedback afterwards
- we held 1 CRA Tech Talk on Conformity and Certification, next one upcoming - Maintainers Guide

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • The new 2026 CRA Awareness and Readiness Report is out highlighting unfamiliarity (still) with the CRA with only 41% of manufacturers expect to be fully compliant by December 2027 as well as the $250k cost of maintaining private forks.

torgo and others added 3 commits June 9, 2026 16:05
Co-authored-by: Roman Zhukov <rzhukov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
Co-authored-by: Roman Zhukov <rzhukov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
Co-authored-by: Roman Zhukov <rzhukov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
@torgo torgo marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2026 15:09
@steiza

steiza commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@torgo I think there's a few placeholders waiting to be deleted, otherwise in general the update looks good to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants