Skip to content

Release v0.1.4: adversarial hardening round 2, website, Pilot integration#3

Merged
TeoSlayer merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-v0.1.4-content
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

Release v0.1.4: adversarial hardening round 2, website, Pilot integration#3
TeoSlayer merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-v0.1.4-content

Conversation

@TeoSlayer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Lands the content of the stranded release/v0.1.4 branch onto main as a single commit (same convention as v0.1.3 / PR #1). The branch was finished on 2026-06-24 but never PRed or tagged — the release pipeline was dead because the macos-13 runner it depended on was retired (fixed in #2).

Included, verbatim from release/v0.1.4 (09fb28a):

  • 9 adversarial-report fixes across two hardening rounds (0c89a09, cc8bce7)
  • AEGIS website under docs/ + CNAME for aegis.pilotprotocol.network, README rewrite
  • Pilot Protocol app integration under integrations/pilot/
  • Version bump 0.1.3 → 0.1.4

Plus one repair on top: Cargo.lock synced to 0.1.4 (the branch bumped only Cargo.toml).

After this merges, tag v0.1.4 on main so the (fixed) release workflow publishes all four binaries, including the aegis-macos-x86_64 asset Homebrew needs on Intel Macs. GitHub Pages will be repointed from release/v0.1.4:/docs to main:/docs before that branch is cleaned up.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Lands the finished release/v0.1.4 branch onto main (it was never
PRed because the release pipeline was stuck on the retired macos-13
runner):

- 9 adversarial-report fixes across two hardening rounds
- AEGIS website (GitHub Pages, docs/ + CNAME for
  aegis.pilotprotocol.network) and README rewrite
- Pilot Protocol app integration (integrations/pilot)
- Version bump 0.1.3 -> 0.1.4 (Cargo.lock synced too, which the
  branch had missed)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@TeoSlayer
TeoSlayer merged commit 27fb1dd into main Jul 13, 2026
2 checks passed
@TeoSlayer
TeoSlayer deleted the release-v0.1.4-content branch July 13, 2026 07:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants