Fixes to CMake configuration to enable testing from build directory

[pelesh]

Merge request type

• New feature
• Resolves bug
• Documentation
• Other

Relates to

• OPFLOW
• SOPFLOW
• SCOPFLOW
• TCOPFLOW
• CMake build system
• Spack configuration
• Manual
• Web docs
• Other

This MR updates

• Header files
• Source code
• CMake build system
• Spack configuration
• Web docs
• Manual
• Other

Summary

I made some changes to CMake, mainly to enable running tests without installing ExaGO first. This is still work in progress but some feedback would be helpful to figure out how to proceed.

Closes #148.
Closes #58.

[nkoukpaizan]

I am currently getting a few new test failures on Frontier, I think because not every instance of exago_add_test was updated to take the WORKING_DIRECTORY argument (e.g., FUNCTIONALITY_TEST_SOPFLOW_SCENARIO3_RAJA_TOML.

Otherwise, the approach works for the updated cases and supports make test without make install.

A few additional thoughts:

• I see some code in the CMakeLists.txt that is intended to copy data to the build directory. Perhaps that is not working as intended and there is an easier fix in that section. If we go with the WORKING_DIRECTORY approach, I think some of that code should be removed.
• Perhaps out of scope for this PR, but with the ability to run the tests without installing, I am questioning the need to install the tests. It's also the case that it's not obvious how to run them manually from the installation directory.

I would suggest explicitly defining the testing data directory (similar to EXAGO_DATAFILES_DIR) in the top level CMakeLists.txt and use it in the test definitions.

[pelesh]

• I see some code in the CMakeLists.txt that is intended to copy data to the build directory. Perhaps that is not working as intended and there is an easier fix in that section. If we go with the WORKING_DIRECTORY approach, I think some of that code should be removed.

This was my doing from several years ago. I agree, that needs to be removed.

[pelesh]

• Perhaps out of scope for this PR, but with the ability to run the tests without installing, I am questioning the need to install the tests. It's also the case that it's not obvious how to run them manually from the installation director

I am not sure about the need to install tests. Perhaps if one has binary only installation of ExaGO, one might want to have an ability to verify that installation does what it is supposed to do.

[PhilipFackler]

This looks good to me.

[pelesh]

@nkoukpaizan, I set the data files directory in the source as the one to be used for testing. I also removed copying data to the build directory. I left installation of tests in there for now.

[nkoukpaizan]

This addresses the issue of needing make test install before make test. Will need another cleanup pass (e.g., disallowing testing from the installation directory if the build directory is not available).