RDS New Rule Section 6 - 2019 & 2022 #1800
Conversation
JacksonJ-KC
force-pushed
the
RDS/JDJ/6-12
branch
from
e096977 to
322dfb0
Compare
JacksonJ-KC
force-pushed
the
RDS/JDJ/6-12
branch
from
8b8a80c to
44a3ce3
Compare
| - Case 1: All interior lighting in the space is controlled by occupancy sensors and modeled via adjustments to the schedules: PASS `if not any(val in ["NONE", "MANUAL_ON", None] for val in occupancy_controls_b): PASS` | ||
| - Case 2: Any interior lighting in the space is missing definitions for occupancy sensor type and schedule adjustments: UNDETERMINED `elif any(val is None for val in occupancy_controls_b) or any(val is None for val in occupancy_sensor_schedules_b): UNDETERMINED` | ||
| - Case 3: Else, at least one interior lighting data group in the space is not controlled by occupancy sensors or modeled via adjustments to the schedules: FAIL `else: FAIL` | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I do not understand the difference between case 2 and case 3. Looks like case 2 is checking for missing values and case 3 is checking for explicitly set 'No' values?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct, a lot of times Case 2 is not written out explicitly and RCT dev team handles it
|
I'm a bit stumped by the numbering on this rule. I'm seeing Section 6 Rule 12 but does that rule not already exist? Is it possible we meant to renumber this to something else? |
|
@jugonzal07 this RDS appears to match the rule description of rule 6-13 in the develop branch. https://github.com/pnnl/ruleset-checking-tool/blob/develop/rct229/rulesets/ashrae9012019/section6/section6rule13.py |
5 participants
No description provided.