Match make_trapezoid to Pulseq MATLAB output#411
Open
simonthalen wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR updates
make_trapezoid(...)to match MATLAB PulseqmakeTrapezoid(...)for equivalent inputs.The main behavioral fix is the
area + durationpath. PyPulseq previously calculated shortest timing first, rounded ramp times, and then solved the requested duration. MATLAB Pulseq first solves the quadratic amplitude for the requested area/duration, rounds the ramp time from that amplitude, and finally recalculates amplitude after raster rounding. That produces different ramp/flat timing and amplitude for the same input.Problem
For the same nominal input:
PyPulseq and Pulseq produces different trapezoids.
As PyPulseq is described as a translation of Pulseq, this is a bug.
What Changed
area + durationbranch to match Pulseq's quadratic solve plus post-raster amplitude recalculation.make_trapezoid(...)API and all unrelated validation behavior unchanged.Behavior Compatibility
This is a bug-fix change limited to
area + durationwhen ramp times are not supplied. That path now returns MATLAB-compatible timing and amplitude; other input combinations retain their existing PyPulseq behavior.Reference Output
The regression test anchors this Pulseq-compatible output:
Testing