Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions iOSTestApp/iOSTestApp/ContentViewModel.swift
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ class ContentViewModel: ObservableObject {
@Published var email = ""
@Published var needToShowAlert = false
@Published var errorText = ""
@Published var ehjsadPitron = 10

}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 AIReviewRadar

The patch adds a new integer variable ehjsadPitron with an initial value of 10 to the ContentViewModel.swift file.

The variable name is not meaningful and does not follow the naming convention mentioned in the guidelines. Please use a more descriptive name that follows the naming convention.

Also, please provide some context on why this variable was added and how it fits into the larger project.

My feedback is:

- The variable name is not meaningful and does not follow the naming convention mentioned in the guidelines. Please use a more descriptive name that follows the naming convention.
- Please provide some context on why this variable was added and how it fits into the larger project.

Expand All @@ -29,4 +30,7 @@ extension ContentViewModel {
}
}

func getPdjasdsa() -> Int {
return ehjsadPitron
}
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 AIReviewRadar

The patch adds a new function getPdjasdsa() to the ContentViewModel.swift file.

The function name is not meaningful and does not follow the naming convention mentioned in the guidelines. Please use a more descriptive name that follows the naming convention.

Also, please provide some context on why this function was added and how it fits into the larger project.

My feedback is:

- The function name is not meaningful and does not follow the naming convention mentioned in the guidelines. Please use a more descriptive name that follows the naming convention.
- Please provide some context on why this function was added and how it fits into the larger project.