Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link

πŸ’‘ What: Replaced manual shifting loops in ShareableArray.unshift, deleteItem, and addOrSetItem with Uint8Array.prototype.copyWithin. Refactored addOrSetItem to handle in-place replacement efficiently without unnecessary shift-left then shift-right operations.

🎯 Why: Manual loop shifting is slow in JS compared to native memmove. The original replacement logic was O(N) due to double shifting, making operations like unshift O(N*K). The optimization makes replacement O(1) (excluding allocation) and shifting O(N) native.

πŸ“Š Measured Improvement: Benchmark shows unshift performance improved from ~1.64ms to ~0.015ms (>100x speedup) for adding 10 items to a 10,000 element array.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 2911820460188290781 started by @pverscha

Replaced manual shifting loop in unshift with copyWithin. Optimized addOrSetItem to avoid double-shifting during replacement.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Author

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant