-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
Derive Categorical from Argmin/Argmax #8072
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
ricardoV94
merged 4 commits into
pymc-devs:main
from
ricardoV94:categorical_derived_rvs
Jul 16, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c6b920d
distribution module: remove eager dependency on model module
ricardoV94 d15cb2d
Use cleaner variadic_[add|mul] in rewrite
ricardoV94 4175fda
Organize test_order and remove dependency on PyMC distributions
ricardoV94 0717876
Derive categorical from argmin/argmax operations
ricardoV94 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wont this break on plain
Negor fusedexp * -scaleunless lift_loc_scale gets there first? idk...Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neither is a problem. Neg gets canonicalized to mul by -1, and for the second, bailing is exactly the right thing. The rewrites are recalled until saturation (when a pass changes nothing). So if this comes before the lift_loc_scale, it bails, then lift_loc_scale does its thing, and then the next call is a hit. You can see them happening if you enable
config.optimizer_verbose:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
on yeah fair my bad
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no need to apologize, they were good questions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks :) but for a bit more clarity, the saturation thing makes sense when lift_loc_scale can actually run
for symbolic outer scale i still dont think that rescue happens because lift_loc_scale bails every pass on constant_fold so graph never changes and hits saturation with neither rewrite matching
constant outer scale does hit lift + categorical
idk if this makes sense, maybe im missing something
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We reject that because scale could be negative and we can't lift negative scales inside the positive distributions. The inline comment says we could do more work say if scale is abs/exp of a root variable then we'd be safe again
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
gotit makes sense thanks :)