30 modular linking between pyat and pyaml elements

[gupichon]

Closes #30

[JeanLucPons]

Would it be possible to replace the FamNameElementsLinker by something like ElementsLinker("FamName") ?
So the default linker can be also used easliy to choose the pyAT attribute name to use.
I would except the attribute name in the ConfigModel with a default to FamName.

[gupichon]

Would it be possible to replace the FamNameElementsLinker by something like ElementsLinker("FamName") ?

I'm working on it. It's a bit tricky with the ConfModel...

---

I would except the attribute name in the ConfigModel with a default to FamName.

I thought about that, but it's actually unnecessary since it behaves the same as not setting a linker at all.

[gupichon]

In the end, I can completly remove the FamNameElementsLinker, it's useless.

[JeanLucPons]

In the end, I can completly remove the FamNameElementsLinker, it's useless.

With a default ElementsLinker with FamName as default, yes FamNameElementsLinker become useless.

[JeanLucPons]

Rename get_at_element() to get_first_at_element() ?

[gupichon]

The purpose of this method is to ensure unicity.
If you want the first of a group, you can just call get_at_elements()[0]
This method may be useless but it will depends of future developpements.

[JeanLucPons]

Make default linker configurable with the pyAT attribute name to use.

[gupichon]

Make default linker configurable with the pyAT attribute name to use.

Isn't that the same as specifying the linker with attribute_linker and providing the desired name?
I don't think it would be a real improvement...

[JeanLucPons]

Make default linker configurable with the pyAT attribute name to use.

Isn't that the same as specifying the linker with attribute_linker and providing the desired name? I don't think it would be a real improvement...

Your modification using:

PyAtAttributeElementsLinker(PyAtAttrLinkerConfigModel(attribute_name="FamName"))

is OK for me.