-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.9k
gh-131798: JIT optimizer: Support custom binary op and property frames #143735
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -3538,6 +3538,44 @@ def testfunc(n): | |||||
| # _POP_TOP_NOP is a sign the optimizer ran and didn't hit bottom. | ||||||
| self.assertGreaterEqual(count_ops(ex, "_POP_TOP_NOP"), 1) | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| def test_binary_op_subscr_init_frame(self): | ||||||
| class B: | ||||||
| def __getitem__(self, other): | ||||||
| return other + 1 | ||||||
| def testfunc(*args): | ||||||
| n, b = args[0] | ||||||
| for _ in range(n): | ||||||
| y = b[2] | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| res, ex = self._run_with_optimizer(testfunc, (TIER2_THRESHOLD, B())) | ||||||
| self.assertIsNotNone(ex) | ||||||
| uops = get_opnames(ex) | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| self.assertIn("_BINARY_OP_SUBSCR_INIT_CALL", uops) | ||||||
| # _POP_TOP_NOP is a sign the optimizer ran and didn't hit bottom. | ||||||
| self.assertGreaterEqual(count_ops(ex, "_POP_TOP_NOP"), 1) | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| def test_load_attr_property_frame(self): | ||||||
| class B: | ||||||
| @property | ||||||
| def prop(self): | ||||||
| return 3 | ||||||
| def testfunc(*args): | ||||||
| n, b = args[0] | ||||||
| for _ in range(n): | ||||||
| y = b.prop + b.prop | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| testfunc((3, B())) | ||||||
| import dis | ||||||
| dis.dis(testfunc, adaptive=True) | ||||||
|
Comment on lines
+3569
to
+3570
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
Leftover from debugging? |
||||||
| res, ex = self._run_with_optimizer(testfunc, (TIER2_THRESHOLD, B())) | ||||||
| self.assertIsNotNone(ex) | ||||||
| uops = get_opnames(ex) | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| self.assertIn("_LOAD_ATTR_PROPERTY_FRAME", uops) | ||||||
| # This is a sign the optimizer ran and didn't hit bottom. | ||||||
| self.assertIn("_INSERT_2_LOAD_CONST_INLINE_BORROW", uops) | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| def test_unary_negative(self): | ||||||
| def testfunc(n): | ||||||
| a = 3 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -327,9 +327,17 @@ dummy_func(void) { | |
| GETLOCAL(this_instr->operand0) = sym_new_null(ctx); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| op(_BINARY_OP_SUBSCR_INIT_CALL, (container, sub, getitem -- new_frame)) { | ||
| new_frame = PyJitRef_NULL; | ||
| ctx->done = true; | ||
| op(_BINARY_OP_SUBSCR_INIT_CALL, (container, sub, getitem -- new_frame)) { | ||
| assert((this_instr + 1)->opcode == _PUSH_FRAME); | ||
| PyCodeObject *co = get_code_with_logging(this_instr + 1); | ||
| if (co == NULL) { | ||
| ctx->done = true; | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| _Py_UOpsAbstractFrame *f = frame_new(ctx, co, 0, NULL, 0); | ||
| f->locals[0] = container; | ||
| f->locals[1] = sub; | ||
| new_frame = PyJitRef_Wrap((JitOptSymbol *)f); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| op(_BINARY_OP_SUBSCR_STR_INT, (str_st, sub_st -- res, s, i)) { | ||
|
|
@@ -759,9 +767,15 @@ dummy_func(void) { | |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| op(_LOAD_ATTR_PROPERTY_FRAME, (fget/4, owner -- new_frame)) { | ||
| (void)fget; | ||
| new_frame = PyJitRef_NULL; | ||
| ctx->done = true; | ||
| assert((this_instr + 2)->opcode == _PUSH_FRAME); | ||
| PyCodeObject *co = get_code_with_logging(this_instr + 2); | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Might be good to add a comment about why are using +2, since I don't know if it's abundantly clear? IIUC, it's because |
||
| if (co == NULL) { | ||
| ctx->done = true; | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| _Py_UOpsAbstractFrame *f = frame_new(ctx, co, 0, NULL, 0); | ||
| f->locals[0] = owner; | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think we need to check if frame is NULL before this, right? |
||
| new_frame = PyJitRef_Wrap((JitOptSymbol *)f); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| op(_INIT_CALL_BOUND_METHOD_EXACT_ARGS, (callable, self_or_null, unused[oparg] -- callable, self_or_null, unused[oparg])) { | ||
|
|
||
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if it's just me but maybe this is a clearer phrasing?