add natsort-rs to list

[valentinstn]

What are you adding?

• Project name: natsort-rs
• GitHub URL: https://github.com/valentinstn/natsort-rs
• Category: Sorting
• Description (one line): Fast natural sorting library, 5-45x faster than alternatives.

Checklist

• The project is Python-related and has a meaningful Rust component
• The GitHub URL is correct and the project is actively maintained
• The entry follows the format: [name](url) - Description.
• The description starts with a capital letter and ends with a period
• The project is placed in the correct category
• No duplicate entry exists in the list

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added a new "Sorting" section to the documentation table of contents
  • Included a new library reference for sorting functionality under the new section

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request adds a new "Sorting" section to the README documentation, introducing the natsort-rs library entry. The change organizes library references by adding a dedicated section for sorting-related utilities within the existing documentation structure.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation README.md	Added a new "Sorting" section to the contents navigation and included the natsort-rs library entry under this section.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A sorting section springs to life,
With natsort-rs, no more strife,
The README grows, organized and neat,
Where libraries dance in ordered beat! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'add natsort-rs to list' directly and specifically describes the main change: adding a library to a list in the README.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

166-169: Entry is valid and meets all requirements.

The GitHub repository exists, is actively maintained, and has meaningful Rust components (Cargo.toml in the natsort_rs subdirectory). The performance claim of "5-45x faster" is accurate, with benchmarks showing up to 44x speedup on small lists. No duplicate entries exist in the README.

Optional: Consider specifying the performance comparison target.

The description would be clearer by specifying that the speedup is compared to pure Python implementations, which is the actual benchmark basis:

📝 Optional: More specific performance claim

-- [natsort-rs](https://github.com/valentinstn/natsort-rs) - Fast natural sorting library, 5-45x faster than alternatives.
+- [natsort-rs](https://github.com/valentinstn/natsort-rs) - Fast natural sorting library, 5-45x faster than pure Python implementations.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@README.md` around lines 166 - 169, Update the README "## Sorting" entry for
"natsort-rs" to clarify the benchmark target by appending that the "5-45x
faster" claim is relative to pure Python implementations (or name the specific
library used in the benchmark), and optionally include a brief parenthetical
with the source of the benchmark (e.g., link or note "benchmarks show up to 44x
on small lists") so readers know the comparison baseline; locate the entry by
the "natsort-rs" string under the "## Sorting" section and edit that line
accordingly.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 166-169: Update the README "## Sorting" entry for "natsort-rs" to
clarify the benchmark target by appending that the "5-45x faster" claim is
relative to pure Python implementations (or name the specific library used in
the benchmark), and optionally include a brief parenthetical with the source of
the benchmark (e.g., link or note "benchmarks show up to 44x on small lists") so
readers know the comparison baseline; locate the entry by the "natsort-rs"
string under the "## Sorting" section and edit that line accordingly.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0d872dbb-7cb1-45e0-b71e-80ab6ad8e99e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e94df4 and 57cf863.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md