feat: add HandOfStraights visualization with interactive step-by-step…

[rkmahale17]

… explanation and test cases

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
rulcode	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 13, 2026 11:18am

[github-actions]

🔍 Tessl Skill Review

.agents/skills/visualization/SKILL.md

Review Details

Review Details

Dimension	Score	Detail
conciseness	██░ 2/3	The content is mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary elaboration. Rules like #4 (Educational Value) and #5 (Instantaneous Transitions) explain rationale that Claude could infer. Some rules could be tightened into shorter bullet points, but overall it's not excessively verbose.
actionability	██░ 2/3	The skill provides specific component names (AnimatedCodeEditor, SimpleStepControls, VariablePanel) and directory paths, which is good. However, it lacks any concrete code examples showing how to structure a visualization file, what imports to use, or what the expected output component skeleton looks like. The guidance is specific in intent but not executable—no copy-paste-ready code.
workflow clarity	██░ 2/3	The workflow has three clear phases (locate, implement, verify), but the verification step is minimal and lacks explicit validation commands or feedback loops. For a task involving complex component synchronization and UI layout, there's no mechanism to validate that code-step sync is correct or that the layout renders properly. The verification is just 'double-check' without concrete steps.
progressive disclosure	██░ 2/3	The content is organized into logical sections (workflow, rules, verification), but the 13 implementation rules are presented as a monolithic list that could benefit from being split into categories or referenced from a separate standards file. No bundle files exist to offload detailed standards, and there are no references to component documentation or examples that could aid navigation.

Overall: The skill provides domain-specific guidance with clear component names and layout conventions, making it useful for its narrow purpose. However, it lacks executable code examples showing what a correct visualization file looks like, which significantly limits actionability. The verification step is too shallow for a task involving complex state synchronization, and the dense list of 13 rules would benefit from better organization or progressive disclosure.

Suggestions:

• Add a concrete, executable code skeleton showing the expected structure of a visualization file, including imports, component composition, and step-state synchronization pattern.
• Strengthen the verification section with specific validation steps—e.g., checking step count matches code lines, verifying state transitions, or running a lint/type check command.
• Group the 13 implementation rules into logical categories (e.g., 'Layout & UI', 'Code Display', 'Step Synchronization', 'Test Cases') with sub-headings for easier scanning.
• Add a brief example showing a minimal correct step definition object with its corresponding code highlight and commentary to make the sync requirement concrete.

---

To improve your score, point your agent at the Tessl optimization guide. Need help? Jump on our Discord.

Feedback

Report issues with this review at tesslio/skill-review, or send private feedback from your terminal with tessl feedback.