Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait#100019
Conversation
|
r? @oli-obk (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #100024) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
719a1a1 to
d90a715
Compare
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #100213) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
d90a715 to
82f2c08
Compare
|
r? @rust-lang/wg-diagnostics |
|
@TaKO8Ki it has only been 6 days since you've submitted this PR, so please wait a bit longer before requesting a new reviewer 😅 |
|
@compiler-errors I had a conflict and requested a review, but as you said, I'll wait a little longer. |
|
r? is to get a new reviewer, not to signal that the PR is ready for a review. But since I already am notified for this, I can take a look later today after a flight. |
|
Looks good! @bors r+ |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#100019 (Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait) - rust-lang#100038 (Document the `no-std` target option in config.toml.example) - rust-lang#100194 (Remove even more box syntax uses from src/test) - rust-lang#100206 (test: skip terminfo parsing in Miri) - rust-lang#100230 (Use start_point instead of next_point to point to elided lifetime amp…) - rust-lang#100244 (Add armv4t-none-eabi take2) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The suggestion implemented in #75608 was not working properly, so I fixed it.