Revert "Unify tcx.constness and param env constness checks"#103284
Merged
bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Oct 26, 2022
Merged
Revert "Unify tcx.constness and param env constness checks"#103284bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
r? @davidtwco (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Contributor
Author
Contributor
Author
|
r? @oli-obk |
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup=never |
Collaborator
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Collaborator
|
Finished benchmarking commit (43dd3d5): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Footnotes |
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2023
Revert "Unify tcx.constness and param env constness checks" Too much of a perf regression rust-lang#102975 (comment), and an attempt in rust-lang#103263 didn't fix it except for just a tiny bit. This change isn't really needed (see rust-lang#102830 (comment)), so this should be an easy revert.
emilyalbini
added a commit
to ferrocene/sphinx-shared-resources
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2023
600: Pull changes from upstream `master` r=kirtchev-adacore a=pietroalbini * rust-lang/rust#103605 * rust-lang/rust#103604 * rust-lang/rust#103598 * rust-lang/rust#103596 * rust-lang/rust#103580 * rust-lang/rust#103579 * rust-lang/rust#103567 * rust-lang/rust#103558 * rust-lang/rust#103549 * rust-lang/rust#103537 * rust-lang/rust#103526 * rust-lang/rust#103432 * rust-lang/rust#103571 * rust-lang/rust#103492 * rust-lang/rust#103572 * rust-lang/rust#103554 * rust-lang/rust#103546 * rust-lang/rust#103543 * rust-lang/rust#103428 * rust-lang/rust#102706 * rust-lang/rust#95710 * rust-lang/rust#103284 * rust-lang/rust#103562 * rust-lang/rust#103542 * rust-lang/rust#103536 * rust-lang/rust#103533 * rust-lang/rust#103520 * rust-lang/rust#103444 * rust-lang/rust#103430 * rust-lang/rust#103416 * rust-lang/rust#103287 * rust-lang/rust#103209 * rust-lang/rust#102951 * rust-lang/rust#103279 * rust-lang/rust#103158 Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Pietro Albini <pietro.albini@ferrous-systems.com> Co-authored-by: DropDemBits <r3usrlnd@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: bors <bors@rust-lang.org> Co-authored-by: Pietro Albini <pietro@pietroalbini.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Too much of a perf regression #102975 (comment), and an attempt in #103263 didn't fix it except for just a tiny bit.
This change isn't really needed (see #102830 (comment)), so this should be an easy revert.