Rollup of 8 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Make core::mem::copy const #100006 (Make core::mem::copy const)
• 1.65.0 release notes #102659 (1.65.0 release notes)
• Add tests for autoderef on block tail #103124 (Add tests for autoderef on block tail)
• rustdoc: add test case for masked blanket impl #103253 (rustdoc: add test case for masked blanket impl)
• use consistent terminology #103715 (use consistent terminology)
• Fix z-indexes of code example feature and cleanup its CSS #103722 (Fix z-indexes of code example feature and cleanup its CSS)
• Avoid unnecessary &str to String conversions #103726 (Avoid unnecessary &str to String conversions)
• rustdoc: use CSS margin/padding shorthand when all are being set #103737 (rustdoc: use CSS margin/padding shorthand when all are being set)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

[bors]

📌 Commit 9c5e61c has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 9c5e61c with merge 4827cee...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 4827cee to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Perf Build Sha
#103737	04709545d70f92560e9a20281ca6cba3a7cc53b9
#103726	f3522610f72f589e40a160ef65dd934aad0cea9e
#103722	f719819345d85224c44e30e63faf3e9013f97851
#103715	ec244bdcd97cc45167e380ceaaa5311d109d6bc6
#103253	6ea0563b3c2f85b5da51d49f45c0d8a6c7b6aa72
#103124	58674bcbb5488be95613483242ca2de94808fa9c
#102659	3a43c762d30732575f35ed96182bb44b286310a0
#100006	4f7a480616269a08e568f0b5da32b2ba62a0ea3e

previous master: 15ee24a2fa

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (4827cee): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-1.4%, -1.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.0%	[-4.0%, -0.5%]	12
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-1.4%, -1.2%]	2

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.4%	[-2.6%, -2.1%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0