Implement some candidates for the new solver (redux)#107004
Merged
bors merged 7 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Jan 19, 2023
Merged
Implement some candidates for the new solver (redux)#107004bors merged 7 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 7 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred to the core trait solver cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor |
Contributor
Author
|
This doesn't completely duplicate the logic in #106384, but I'm going to go a bit slower to avoid doing too much work and then having it accidentally obsoleted by refactors 😅 I am pretty happy with the structure of the new assembly, though. |
Collaborator
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #106998) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
lcnr
reviewed
Jan 18, 2023
Contributor
lcnr
left a comment
lcnr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
would it make sense to take the
probe {
instantiate_constituent_tys_for_X
evaluate_goal_for_constituent_tys_and_make_canonical_response
}pattern and make that a function taking a closure/function for instantiate_constituent_tys_for_X, removing the separate function for
evaluate_goal_for_constituent_tys_and_make_canonical_response?
I think it would also be nice to maybe move all impls of instantiate_constituent_tys_for_X into a submodule as their concrete impl is fairly unimportant when trying to understand the solver.
Apart from these nits r=me 👍
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
new-solver-new-candidates-2
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e776e88 to
53f15c5
Compare
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
new-solver-new-candidates-2
branch
from
53f15c5 to
f672436
Compare
lcnr
reviewed
Jan 18, 2023
Comment on lines
+339
to
+348
| for assumption in | ||
| elaborate_predicates(tcx, bounds.iter().map(|bound| bound.with_self_ty(tcx, self_ty))) | ||
| { | ||
| match G::consider_assumption(self, goal, assumption.predicate) { | ||
| Ok(result) => { | ||
| candidates.push(Candidate { source: CandidateSource::BuiltinImpl, result }) | ||
| } | ||
| Err(NoSolution) => (), | ||
| } | ||
| } |
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2023
…didates-2, r=lcnr Implement some candidates for the new solver (redux) Based on rust-lang#106718, so the diff is hard to read without it. See [here](rust-lang/rust@98700cf...compiler-errors:rust:new-solver-new-candidates-2) for an easier view until that one lands. Of note: * 44af916020fb43c12070125c45b6dee4ec303bbc fixes a bug where we need to make the query response *inside* of a probe, or else we make no inference progress (I think) * 50daad5acd2f163d03e7ffab942534f09bc36e2e implements `consider_assumption` for traits and predicates. I'm not sure if using `sup` here is necessary or if `eq` is fine. * We decided that all of the `instantiate_constituent_tys_for_*` functions are verbose but ok, since they need to be exhaustive and the logic between each of them is not similar enough, right? r? `@lcnr`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2023
…mpiler-errors Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#105796 (rustdoc: simplify JS search routine by not messing with lev distance) - rust-lang#106753 (Make sure that RPITITs are not considered suggestable) - rust-lang#106917 (Encode const mir for closures if they're const) - rust-lang#107004 (Implement some candidates for the new solver (redux)) - rust-lang#107023 (Stop using `BREAK` & `CONTINUE` in compiler) - rust-lang#107030 (Correct typo) - rust-lang#107042 (rustdoc: fix corner cases with "?" JS keyboard command) - rust-lang#107045 (rustdoc: remove redundant CSS rule `#settings .setting-line`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on #106718, so the diff is hard to read without it. See here for an easier view until that one lands.
Of note:
consider_assumptionfor traits and predicates. I'm not sure if usingsuphere is necessary or ifeqis fine.instantiate_constituent_tys_for_*functions are verbose but ok, since they need to be exhaustive and the logic between each of them is not similar enough, right?r? @lcnr