Rollup of 7 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• More accurate spans for arg removal suggestion #106347 (More accurate spans for arg removal suggestion)
• Prevent some attributes from being merged with others on reexports #108057 (Prevent some attributes from being merged with others on reexports)
• if $c:expr { Some($r:expr) } else { None } =>> $c.then(|| $r) #108090 (if $c:expr { Some($r:expr) } else { None } =>> $c.then(|| $r))
• note issue for feature(packed_bundled_libs) #108092 (note issue for feature(packed_bundled_libs))
• use chars instead of strings where applicable #108099 (use chars instead of strings where applicable)
• Do not ICE on unmet trait alias bounds #108115 (Do not ICE on unmet trait alias bounds)
• Add new people to the compiletest review rotation #108125 (Add new people to the compiletest review rotation)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

[bors]

📌 Commit eb9f9c7 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit eb9f9c7 with merge 9a7cc6c...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 9a7cc6c to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Perf Build Sha
#108125	f4a9458a69d8009569ec9ad2121785b480af7eae
#108115	44de64e143d35822de1778f553683cdd84d2e40e
#108099	65c019942fb07564443fcaed03faa4309d8474aa
#108092	990de89ab9ee4986064815d6bc4f7d01c5455a17
#108090	93b0424647d0a51641a82aca00b7cfb084ce33f7
#108057	47a1e7e7b2c5653bd8a8ae9193fc2a712d52d4d1
#106347	5b1f3aa06b2a85b100ac906d29ae1fd3d0bdf79b

previous master: c5d1b3ea96

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (9a7cc6c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.1%	[-1.1%, -1.1%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.4%	[1.4%, 3.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.2%	[0.9%, 3.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.4%	[1.4%, 3.5%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.