Tweak query accessors

[Zoxc]

This is a variant of #107802 which does not extract the code into a macro. It performs similarly locally.

[rustbot]

r? @davidtwco

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[Zoxc]

This should get a perf run so we can see if it shares the bootstrap regressions with #107802.

[oli-obk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 10f63c0 with merge 84320bf83663fb57c7f572cb9be421e65dc78b45...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 84320bf83663fb57c7f572cb9be421e65dc78b45 (84320bf83663fb57c7f572cb9be421e65dc78b45)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (84320bf83663fb57c7f572cb9be421e65dc78b45): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.5%]	9
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.7%	[0.4%, 1.0%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.5%	[-0.7%, -0.3%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.5%]	9

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.3%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.2%	[-3.3%, -3.0%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.3%	[2.3%, 2.3%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.3%	[1.9%, 2.8%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.3%	[2.3%, 2.3%]	1

[davidtwco]

r? @cjgillot since this is related to #107802

[Zoxc]

@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-review +S-blocked

I'd consider this blocked on #108638 like #107802.