1.70.0 release notes

[Mark-Simulacrum]

r? @cuviper @rust-lang/release

[saethlin]

#98112 got the relnotes label but I can't find it in the diff (I've never interacted with this process before).

[Mark-Simulacrum]

I think I dropped it because I assumed (incorrectly?) that it wouldn't apply to user usage, perhaps because our tooling got sorted under T-libs.

[saethlin]

Race condition. This will be much more clear once you get to the crater triage :)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

Updated with stabilized APIs and fixing nits, going to go ahead and approve since release is next week.

@bors r+ rollup p=1

[bors]

📌 Commit 89b9b25 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 89b9b25 with merge bc428f8...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing bc428f8 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (bc428f8): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.3%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.4%	[-2.4%, -2.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.4%	[-2.4%, -2.4%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 646.05s -> 647.298s (0.19%)