Fix failing clippy tests

[Alexendoo]

Comments out the C string literals due to #113334

Fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#11121

Opened against rust-lang/rust in order to unblock #113450

r? @Nilstrieb

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

[Noratrieb]

I also just put up a PR up in clippy (that also slightly improves other code in the file) :D
rust-lang/rust-clippy#11122
I verified it locally with cherry-picked eaa5abb0f58fc8a764104e3b1d552e72eac02945 and it passed.
@bors r+ p=20

[bors]

📌 Commit cedcd39 has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit cedcd39 with merge eee6b31...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Nilstrieb
Pushing eee6b31 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (eee6b31): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.7%	[-1.7%, -1.7%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.5%	[-3.0%, -2.2%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.5%	[-3.0%, -2.2%]	4

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 655.85s -> 655.621s (-0.03%)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

Dropping beta labels as this made it into 1.72.