Conversation
|
This PR changes MIR cc @oli-obk, @RalfJung, @JakobDegen, @davidtwco, @celinval, @vakaras Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri This PR changes Stable MIR cc @oli-obk, @celinval, @spastorino, @ouz-a Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift cc @bjorn3 Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt |
cd40aba to
4cdfc18
Compare
4cdfc18 to
2ebd0c9
Compare
|
Some changes occurred in engine.rs, potentially modifying the public API of |
|
I think this should be it, removed everything, please let me know if there is anything else that catches your eye |
| // check-fail | ||
| // failure-status: 101 | ||
| // dont-check-compiler-stderr | ||
| // known-bug: unknown | ||
| // compile-flags: -Z mir-opt-level=3 | ||
| #![feature(type_alias_impl_trait)] | ||
| #![crate_type = "lib"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah the issue didn't existed when I created this (chicken egg problem 😄 ) will fix it.
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #118692) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
based on latest comments, I think I can flip the review flag @rustbot author |
|
alright, based on the convo in #112651 (comment) I believe we should remove these projections 😅 sorry @ouz-a for all the delays and I would love to review this PR if you want to pick it up again |
|
@ouz-a any updates on this? thanks |
This PR reverts
ProjectionElem::Subtypewhich was introduced in #115025 which attempetd to fix #107205 but couldn't completely solve the issue due to #112651 (comment), so leaving this as half-solution is more dangerous than completely removing it.r? @lcnr