Suggest [tail @ ..] on [..tail] and [...tail] where tail is unresolved#120597
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Feb 6, 2024
Merged
Suggest [tail @ ..] on [..tail] and [...tail] where tail is unresolved#120597bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
[tail @ ..] on [..tail] and [...tail] where tail is unresolved#120597bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
fmease
commented
Feb 3, 2024
| // where the user might have meant `[first, rest @ ..]`. | ||
| let (span, snippet) = match side { | ||
| Side::Start => (segment.ident.span.between(range.span), " @ ".into()), | ||
| Side::End => (range.span.to(segment.ident.span), format!("{} @ ..", segment.ident)), |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I briefly experimented with a multipart suggestion here but I didn't like how it got rendered:
LL - [head, ..tail] => {}
LL + [head, tail @ ..] => {}
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
And thus I reverted to a single-piece suggestion:
LL | [head, tail @ ..] => {}
| ~~~~~~~~~
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
However, I can use a multipart suggestion if you'd like me to, of course.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I personally prefer the diff output, because it has less opportunity for confusion and behaves better in the face of longer pieces of code (think complex nested patterns, in this case it will always be an ident so it's fine), but don't care either way, as long as the users get the information.
fmease
added
the
S-blocked
fmease
force-pushed
the
sugg-on-js-style-spread-op-in-pat
branch
from
4bdc63e to
285d8c2
Compare
fmease
removed
the
S-blocked
estebank
reviewed
Feb 5, 2024
Comment on lines
+68
to
+77
| error[E0658]: exclusive range pattern syntax is experimental | ||
| --> $DIR/range-pattern-meant-to-be-slice-rest-pattern.rs:11:13 | ||
| | | ||
| LL | [_, ..tail] => println!("{tail}"), | ||
| | ^^^^^^ | ||
| | | ||
| = note: see issue #37854 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37854> for more information | ||
| = help: add `#![feature(exclusive_range_pattern)]` to the crate attributes to enable | ||
| = note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date | ||
| = help: use an inclusive range pattern, like N..=M |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd like it if we could bubble information about having given a suggestion so that we don't provide less useful messages, but whatever, it's not the end of the world and it could be that someone is trying to use this nightly feature.
estebank
reviewed
Feb 5, 2024
| | | ||
| = note: see issue #37854 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37854> for more information | ||
| = help: add `#![feature(exclusive_range_pattern)]` to the crate attributes to enable | ||
| = note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date |
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
…in-pat, r=estebank Suggest `[tail @ ..]` on `[..tail]` and `[...tail]` where `tail` is unresolved Fixes rust-lang#120591. ~~Will conflict with rust-lang#120570~~ (rebased). r? estebank or compiler
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
…in-pat, r=estebank Suggest `[tail @ ..]` on `[..tail]` and `[...tail]` where `tail` is unresolved Fixes rust-lang#120591. ~~Will conflict with rust-lang#120570~~ (rebased). r? estebank or compiler
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#120302 (various const interning cleanups) - rust-lang#120520 (Some cleanups around diagnostic levels.) - rust-lang#120521 (Make `NonZero` constructors generic.) - rust-lang#120527 (Switch OwnedStore handle count to AtomicU32) - rust-lang#120564 (coverage: Split out counter increment sites from BCB node/edge counters) - rust-lang#120575 (Simplify codegen diagnostic handling) - rust-lang#120597 (Suggest `[tail @ ..]` on `[..tail]` and `[...tail]` where `tail` is unresolved) - rust-lang#120609 (hir: Stop keeping prefixes for most of `use` list stems) - rust-lang#120633 (pattern_analysis: gather up place-relevant info) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#120520 (Some cleanups around diagnostic levels.) - rust-lang#120575 (Simplify codegen diagnostic handling) - rust-lang#120597 (Suggest `[tail @ ..]` on `[..tail]` and `[...tail]` where `tail` is unresolved) - rust-lang#120602 (rustc_monomorphize: fix outdated comment in partition) - rust-lang#120609 (hir: Stop keeping prefixes for most of `use` list stems) - rust-lang#120631 (Emit a diagnostic for invalid target options) - rust-lang#120632 (For E0223, suggest associated functions that are similar to the path) - rust-lang#120670 (cleanup effect var handling) - rust-lang#120673 (rustc_metadata: fix typo) - rust-lang#120683 (miri: fix ICE with symbolic alignment check on extern static) - rust-lang#120690 (Remove b-naber from the compiler review rotation) - rust-lang#120713 (Make async closures test use async bound modifier) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120597 - fmease:sugg-on-js-style-spread-op-in-pat, r=estebank Suggest `[tail @ ..]` on `[..tail]` and `[...tail]` where `tail` is unresolved Fixes rust-lang#120591. ~~Will conflict with rust-lang#120570~~ (rebased). r? estebank or compiler
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #120591.
Will conflict with #120570(rebased).r? estebank or compiler