Fill in HIR hash for associated opaque types

[petrochenkov]

Fixes #122508

[rustbot]

r? @TaKO8Ki

rustbot has assigned @TaKO8Ki.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors p=1

[oli-obk]

r? @oli-obk

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit ef5513f has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors p=2

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors p=15

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit ef5513f with merge 4bc1b3d...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job aarch64-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

   Compiling rustc_traits v0.0.0 (/checkout/compiler/rustc_traits)
   Compiling rustc_hir_typeck v0.0.0 (/checkout/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck)
[RUSTC-TIMING] rustc_resolve test:false 82.045
   Compiling rustc_mir_transform v0.0.0 (/checkout/compiler/rustc_mir_transform)
##[error]The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.
##[group]Clock drift check
  local time: Fri Mar 15 00:01:57 UTC 2024
  network time: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:01:57 GMT
##[endgroup]
##[endgroup]
Session terminated, killing shell... ...killed.
##[error]The operation was canceled.

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[lqd]

@bors retry The runner has received a shutdown signal

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit ef5513f with merge ee03c28...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing ee03c28 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (ee03c28): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.1%	[-2.5%, -1.6%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 671.201s -> 669.125s (-0.31%)
Artifact size: 311.47 MiB -> 311.46 MiB (-0.00%)

[lqd]

nit: this comment is leftover but now belongs in hash_owner_nodes

[klensy]

#122396 | Try | 918ae71 | Finished | 3/15/2024, 2:42:19 PM | 1h 10m 14s |  
#122517 | Master | ee03c28 | Finished | 3/15/2024, 11:27:30 AM | 1h 41m 06s |  
#122053 | Try | 7a9b98b | Finished | 3/15/2024, 9:06:14 AM | 1h 10m 32s |  
#122511 | Master | c2901f5 | Finished | 3/15/2024, 6:58:22 AM | 1h 10m 40s |  
#122514 | Master | f4b771b | Finished | 3/15/2024, 5:45:13 AM | 1h 10m 24s

Strange fluke in time for perf run time for this pr (currently from https://perf.rust-lang.org/status.html)
cargo perf run was 35 mins instead of 5.

cargo-0.60.0 |   | 5m 03s | 35m 14s