Rollup of 4 pull requests#123229
Closed
matthiaskrgr wants to merge 10 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Closed
Conversation
For robustness, also test the disposition in our own process even if other tests in `tests/ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe` already covers it.
While the KCFI scheme is not incompatible with unwinding, LLVM's `invoke` instruction does not currently support KCFI bundles. While it likely will in the near future, we won't be able to assume that in Rust for a while.
Prefer 'log' over 'log out' to avoid confusion, and use backticks consistently.
…ark-Simulacrum unix_sigpipe: Add test for SIGPIPE disposition in child processes To make it clearer what the impact would be to stop using `SIG_IGN` and instead use a noop handler, like suggested [here](rust-lang#62569 (comment)) and implemented [here](rust-lang#121578). Part of rust-lang#97889
Replace regions in const canonical vars' types with `'static` in next-solver canonicalizer We shouldn't ever have non-static regions in consts on stable (or really any regions at all, lol). The test I committed is less minimal than, e.g., rust-lang#123155 -- however, I believe that it actually portrays the underlying issue here a bit better than that one. In the linked issue, we end up emitting a normalizes-to predicate for a const placeholder because we don't actually unify `false` and `""`. In the test I committed, we emit a normalizes-to predicate as a part of actually solving a negative coherence goal. Fixes rust-lang#123155 Fixes rust-lang#118783 r? lcnr
KCFI: Require -C panic=abort While the KCFI scheme is not incompatible with unwinding, LLVM's `invoke` instruction does not currently support KCFI bundles. While it likely will in the near future, we won't be able to assume that in Rust for a while. We encountered this problem while [turning on closure support](rust-lang#123106 (comment)). r? `@workingjubilee`
Improve wording in std::any explanation Prefer 'log' over 'log out' to avoid confusion, and use backticks consistently.
rustbot
added
PG-exploit-mitigations
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
'staticin next-solver canonicalizer #123170 (Replace regions in const canonical vars' types with'staticin next-solver canonicalizer)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup