Rollup of 3 pull requests#124856
Closed
matthiaskrgr wants to merge 10 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Closed
Conversation
This code for recalculating `mcdc_bitmap_bytes` doesn't provide any benefit, because its result won't have changed from the value in `FunctionCoverageInfo` that was computed during the MIR instrumentation pass.
These comments appear to be inspired by the similar comments on `CounterIncrement` and `ExpressionUsed`. But those comments refer to specific simplification steps performed during coverage codegen, and there is no corresponding step for the MC/DC coverage statements.
This field counts the number of conditions that contribute to a particular decision, but the name "conditions num" sounds like an ID instead of a count, so "num conditions" is clearer.
…er-errors coverage: Branch coverage support for let-else and if-let This PR adds branch coverage instrumentation for let-else and if-let, including let-chains. This lifts two of the limitations listed at rust-lang#124118.
…r-errors coverage: Clean up `mcdc_bitmap_bytes` and `conditions_num` This is a combination of two mostly-separate MC/DC coverage cleanups that would conflict with each other, plus some extra tests that appeared along the way. The first change is to stop recomputing `mcdc_bitmap_bytes` in the query that produces `CoverageIdsInfo`. This appears to have been inspired by how we were already computing `max_counter_id`, but there's an important difference between the two cases. When computing `max_counter_id`, the highest counter ID seen might be less than the highest ID used during MIR instrumentation, because some counter-increment statements might have been removed by MIR optimizations. But for the recomputation used for `mcdc_bitmap_bytes`, that's impossible, because both computations are based on pre-optimization info. So there's no need to recompute the exact same value, when it can't have changed --- The second change is to rename `conditions_num` to `num_conditions`, to make it clearer that this refers to a *number of conditions*, not some kind of ID number. Because this change touched the compiler warning for a decision containing too many conditions, I also noticed that we didn't have any tests for that warning. (It now seems a bit strange to me that this is a compiler warning, not a lint, because it can't be silenced or denied by the usual mechanisms for controlling lints. But I consider that change to be beyond the scope of this PR.)
…tmcm next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=3 |
Collaborator
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 3 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#124223 (coverage: Branch coverage support for let-else and if-let) - rust-lang#124571 (coverage: Clean up `mcdc_bitmap_bytes` and `conditions_num`) - rust-lang#124838 (next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Collaborator
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
mcdc_bitmap_bytesandconditions_num#124571 (coverage: Clean upmcdc_bitmap_bytesandconditions_num)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup