Revert "Auto merge of #115105 - cjgillot:dest-prop-default, r=oli-obk"

[cjgillot]

This reverts commit cfb7304, reversing changes made to 91c0823.

To address #115105 (comment)
r? @oli-obk

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

[compiler-errors]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=10

[bors]

📌 Commit e110567 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e110567 with merge 366da30...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing 366da30 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (366da30): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.5%	[0.2%, 4.2%]	18
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.8%	[0.1%, 1.5%]	20
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-3.2%, -0.3%]	15
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.5%	[-3.1%, -0.4%]	18
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-3.2%, 4.2%]	33

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.7%, secondary -4.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.5%	[2.2%, 7.5%]	5
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-4.1%	[-7.9%, -0.7%]	6
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.3%	[-4.3%, -4.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-7.9%, 7.5%]	11

Cycles

Results (primary -1.0%, secondary -3.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.2%	[3.2%, 3.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-2.0%, -1.1%]	7
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.6%	[-5.7%, -2.2%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-2.0%, 3.2%]	8

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%, secondary -0.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.0%, 0.7%]	51
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.9%	[0.1%, 1.5%]	13
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.6%, -0.0%]	29
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-6.1%, -0.0%]	54
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-0.6%, 0.7%]	80

Bootstrap: 672.444s -> 666.738s (-0.85%)
Artifact size: 318.74 MiB -> 318.79 MiB (0.02%)

[pnkfelix]

• revert of PR which had big performance regression not caught by benchmark suite
• marking as triaged

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged